From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Keir Fraser <keir.xen@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] EFI updates
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 12:40:52 +0100
Message-ID: <CD9AE054.22506%keir.xen@gmail.com>
References: <5175272902000078000CF6D6@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <5175272902000078000CF6D6@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>, xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Cc: George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 22/04/2013 11:03, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com> wrote:

> 1: x86/EFI: pass boot services variable info to runtime code
> 2: EFI: update error indicators
> 
> The first, while possibly looking like a feature addition, is really the
> foundation for a kernel side firmware bug workaround.
> 
> The second is mostly cosmetic, so I think both should be fine to
> apply despite the feature freeze.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>

Well they don't look particularly likely to break anything.

Acked-by: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>

> 
>