From: Keir Fraser <keir.xen@gmail.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>,
George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com>,
konrad wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Subject: Re: Xen 4.3 + tmem = Xen BUG at domain_page.c:143
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 16:11:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CDDE4E1D.29DDB%keir.xen@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51B881BD02000078000DD907@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
On 12/06/2013 13:12, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com> wrote:
>> What we see above is that this failure path succeeds three times, but
>> fails the fourth time: there are, in fact, no zero entries after the
>> garbage clean-up; however, because "inuse" is 32-bit (effectively) and
>> "accum" is 64-bit, ~inuse always has bits 32-63 set, and so will
>> always return true and never fall back to the "something else"
>
> Right, that's what occurred to me too yesterday, but the again
> I knew I had seen this code path executed. Now that I look again,
> I think I understand why: All of my Dom0-s and typical DomU-s
> have a vCPU count divisible by 4, and with MAPCACHE_VCPU_ENTRIES
> being 16, the full unsigned long would always be used.
Why are we so tight on MAPCACHE_VCPU_ENTRIES? Why not say double that number
and get rid of the accum and the 'replace a hash entry instead' logic
instead? We never used to have it, and it's kind of extra complication and a
bit gross.
-- Keir
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-12 15:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-11 13:45 Xen 4.3 + tmem = Xen BUG at domain_page.c:143 konrad wilk
2013-06-11 14:46 ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-11 15:30 ` konrad wilk
2013-06-11 15:56 ` George Dunlap
2013-06-11 16:38 ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-11 17:30 ` konrad wilk
2013-06-11 18:52 ` konrad wilk
2013-06-11 21:06 ` konrad wilk
2013-06-12 6:38 ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-12 11:00 ` George Dunlap
2013-06-12 11:15 ` Processed: " xen
2013-06-12 11:37 ` George Dunlap
2013-06-12 12:46 ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-12 14:13 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-06-12 12:12 ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-12 13:16 ` George Dunlap
2013-06-12 13:27 ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-12 15:11 ` Keir Fraser [this message]
2013-06-12 15:27 ` Keir Fraser
2013-06-12 15:54 ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-12 15:48 ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-12 17:26 ` Keir Fraser
2013-07-05 16:56 ` George Dunlap
2013-07-08 8:58 ` Jan Beulich
2013-07-08 9:07 ` George Dunlap
2013-07-08 9:15 ` Processed: " xen
2013-07-08 9:25 ` George Dunlap
2013-07-08 9:30 ` Processed: " xen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CDDE4E1D.29DDB%keir.xen@gmail.com \
--to=keir.xen@gmail.com \
--cc=George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.