Re: [Webhob] Web Hob documentation?

["Barros Pena, Belen" <belen.barros.pena@intel.com>]

On 13/06/2013 15:07, "Rifenbark, Scott M" <scott.m.rifenbark@intel.com>
wrote:

>Please open a bug saying we need Web Hob documentation.  That way I can
>track it.

Done :)

https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4730

I've put it against M5 and assigned it to you. Feel free to change that as
needed.

Cheers

Belen



>
>Thanks Belen!
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Barros Pena, Belen
>>Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2013 7:07 AM
>>To: Rifenbark, Scott M
>>Cc: webhob@yoctoproject.org
>>Subject: Re: [Webhob] Web Hob documentation?
>>
>>
>>On 13/06/2013 14:55, "Rifenbark, Scott M" <scott.m.rifenbark@intel.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>Ahh Š okay.  My mistake on that.  I was thinking plain, old Hob.
>>
>>No worries: I didn't give you that much to go by, to be honest. My bad.
>>
>>Should I open an issue in Bugzilla for the Web Hob documentation, or
>>would
>>you rather deal with this in some other way?
>>
>>Thanks!!
>>
>>Belen
>>
>>>
>>>Scott
>>>
>>>From: Bill Traynor [mailto:btraynor@gmail.com]
>>>
>>>Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2013 6:44 AM
>>>To: Barros Pena, Belen
>>>Cc: Rifenbark, Scott M; Richard Purdie; Paul Eggleton;
>>>webhob@yoctoproject.org
>>>Subject: Re: [Webhob] Web Hob documentation?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Barros Pena, Belen
>>><belen.barros.pena@intel.com> wrote:
>>>On 13/06/2013 13:11, "Rifenbark, Scott M" <scott.m.rifenbark@intel.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>Right now we have a small section in the dev-manual that is called
>>"Image
>>>>Development Using Hob".  It introduces Hob as a method to develop
>>images,
>>>>states it is UI-driven, and tells how you can set it up and invoke it.
>>>>It references our Hob page on the website.  The section also
>>highlights
>>>>and lists the main functions that you can do using Hob. So I think
>>what
>>>>you are saying needs to be in the YP docs already exists.
>>>
>>>I might be reading this wrong (sorry if that's the case), but Hob and
>>Web
>>>Hob are different tools. Hob is a building tool and it's a native
>>>application. The first version of Web Hob, which is what we are
>>referring
>>>to here, is more a build analysis tool, and it's a web application (it
>>>runs on your browser). So it looks like we'll need:
>>>
>>>* A new section in the YP manuals (not sure which one of them) for Web
>>Hob
>>>* A new wiki page for Web Hob
>>>* A new webpage on the website for Web hob
>>>
>>>According to Richard's list, the above should cover:
>>>
>>>* basic information about the fact the UI exists,
>>>* how to start it,
>>>* what the capabilities are,
>>>* the limitations
>>>* some indication of future plans (high level).
>>>
>>>If we add any developer oriented docs, those would go in the bitbake
>>>manual.
>>>
>>>Would people agree with this?
>>>
>>>
>>>I would agree.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Belen
>>>
>>>>
>>>>Scott
>>>>
>>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>>From: Richard Purdie [mailto:richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org]
>>>>>Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2013 4:38 AM
>>>>>To: Bill Traynor
>>>>>Cc: Barros Pena, Belen; Paul Eggleton; Rifenbark, Scott M;
>>>>>webhob@yoctoproject.org
>>>>>Subject: Re: [Webhob] Web Hob documentation?
>>>>>
>>>>>On Thu, 2013-06-13 at 07:23 -0400, Bill Traynor wrote:
>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 6:59 AM, Barros Pena, Belen
>>>>>> <belen.barros.pena@intel.com> wrote:
>>>>>>         I am not even sure if need to produce Web Hob documentation
>>>>>>         for the 1.5
>>>>>>         release, but I thought I'd bring it up just in case. Maybe
>>>>>>         something
>>>>>>         lightweight, like the Hob manual page on the website, might
>>be
>>>>>>         enough.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>         Let me know what you think.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is Webhob to be a part of BitBake proper?  I see that Webhob
>>patches
>>>>>> are hitting the bitbake-devel list.  If the answer is yes, that
>>Webhob
>>>>>> is to be a part of BitBake and it's source code live within the
>>>>>> BitBake source tree, then my feeling is that it's documentation
>>should
>>>>>> be part of the BitBake manual.
>>>>>
>>>>>I think the answer is "it depends". I think for 1.5 we will need some
>>>>>basic information about the fact the UI exists,  how to start it,
>>what
>>>>>the capabilities are, the limitations and some indication of future
>>>>>plans (high level). This would probably be fine in the YP manuals
>>and/or
>>>>>on the wiki. If we do add any developer oriented docs such as how to
>>>>>extend/customise it, those would probably be best in the bitbake
>>manual.
>>>>>
>>>>>Cheers,
>>>>>
>>>>>Richard
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>Intel Corporation (UK) Limited
>>>Registered No. 1134945 (England)
>>>Registered Office: Pipers Way, Swindon SN3 1RJ
>>>VAT No: 860 2173 47
>>>
>>>This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
>>>the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
>>>by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
>>>recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Corporation (UK) Limited
Registered No. 1134945 (England)
Registered Office: Pipers Way, Swindon SN3 1RJ
VAT No: 860 2173 47

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.