From: Keir Fraser <keir.xen@gmail.com>
To: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>, xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Cc: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
Juergen Gross <juergen.gross@ts.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: fix race between sched_move_domain() and vcpu_wake()
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 12:47:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CE7DA3D3.39085%keir.xen@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1381426196-11392-1-git-send-email-david.vrabel@citrix.com>
On 10/10/2013 18:29, "David Vrabel" <david.vrabel@citrix.com> wrote:
> From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
>
> sched_move_domain() changes v->processor for all the domain's VCPUs.
> If another domain, softirq etc. triggers a simultaneous call to
> vcpu_wake() (e.g., by setting an event channel as pending), then
> vcpu_wake() may lock one schedule lock and try to unlock another.
>
> vcpu_schedule_lock() attempts to handle this but only does so for the
> window between reading the schedule_lock from the per-CPU data and the
> spin_lock() call. This does not help with sched_move_domain()
> changing v->processor between the calls to vcpu_schedule_lock() and
> vcpu_schedule_unlock().
>
> Fix the race by taking the schedule_lock for v->processor in
> sched_move_domain().
>
> Signed-off-by: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
> Cc: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>
> Cc: Juergen Gross <juergen.gross@ts.fujitsu.com>
> Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Acked-by: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-11 11:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-10 17:29 [PATCH] sched: fix race between sched_move_domain() and vcpu_wake() David Vrabel
2013-10-10 18:01 ` Andrew Cooper
2013-10-10 18:27 ` Keir Fraser
2013-10-11 7:12 ` Jan Beulich
2013-10-11 8:07 ` Keir Fraser
2013-10-11 9:02 ` Andrew Cooper
2013-10-11 9:32 ` Jan Beulich
2013-10-11 9:36 ` David Vrabel
2013-10-11 9:37 ` Jan Beulich
2013-10-11 12:20 ` Jan Beulich
2013-10-11 14:39 ` George Dunlap
2013-10-11 14:45 ` George Dunlap
2013-10-11 15:00 ` Processed: " xen
2013-10-11 10:36 ` George Dunlap
2013-10-11 6:37 ` Juergen Gross
2013-10-11 10:32 ` George Dunlap
2013-10-11 11:15 ` Dario Faggioli
2013-10-11 11:32 ` George Dunlap
2013-10-11 11:49 ` Dario Faggioli
2013-10-11 12:03 ` Jan Beulich
2013-10-11 11:47 ` Keir Fraser [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CE7DA3D3.39085%keir.xen@gmail.com \
--to=keir.xen@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
--cc=george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=juergen.gross@ts.fujitsu.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.