All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Dilger, Andreas" <andreas.dilger@intel.com>
To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: "linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: "make check" broken on maint branch?
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 18:24:09 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CE98BD77.7C15F%andreas.dilger@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131101032115.GA14263@thunk.org>

On 2013/10/31 9:21 PM, "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> wrote:

>On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 10:35:56AM +0800, Zheng Liu wrote:
>> Hi Andreas,
>> 
>> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 09:35:25PM +0000, Dilger, Andreas wrote:
>> > I tried to add in a "truncate -s $SIZE_2 $TMPFILE", but it complains
>>that
>> > it isn't able to truncate the file in /tmp to 2TB:
>> > 
>> >   truncating `/tmp/e2fsprogs-tmp.OGxb09' at 2199023255552 bytes: File
>>too
>> > large
>> > 
>> > Testing manually, it seems I'm not allowed to create a file in tmpfs
>>larger
>> > than 256GB.  How large does this file need to be for this test to be
>>valid?
>> > 
>> > Anyone else seen these problems, or do I need to dig in further?
>> 
>> Yes, I also can see these problems.
>
>Hmm.... it works for me.  Run while r_64bit_big_expand is running:
>
>% ls -l tmp
>...
>24896 -rw-r--r--. 1 tytso      tytso      2199023255552 Oct 31 23:17
>e2fsprogs-tmp.pkOcCc
>...
>
>% df /tmp
>Filesystem     1K-blocks  Used Available Use% Mounted on
>tmpfs            3216420 26008   3190412   1% /tmp
>
>What version of the kernel are you running?  I am using 3.12-rc5 plus
>the ext4 dev tree, so I'm using a pretty recent kernel.

It was in the original email - the failing systems are both RHEL6,
2.6.32-358.11.1.el6 (w/4GB RAM) and 2.6.32-279.5.1.el6 (w/ 2GB RAM).
Both fail to create files in tmpfs larger than 256GB.


>Maybe this is a relatively new feature of tmpfs?  If so, I should
>probably change the test so that it's a bit more portable on people
>using older kernels.

Looking at the s_maxbytes value in current kernels shows me that it was
changed in v3.0-7280-g285b2c4 and has not been backported to the RHEL 6
kernel that I'm using at least.


Cheers, Andreas
-- 
Andreas Dilger

Lustre Software Architect
Intel High Performance Data Division



      parent reply	other threads:[~2013-11-01 18:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-10-31 21:35 "make check" broken on maint branch? Dilger, Andreas
2013-11-01  2:35 ` Zheng Liu
2013-11-01  3:21   ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-11-01 13:12     ` Zheng Liu
2013-11-01 16:48       ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-11-04  6:20         ` Zheng Liu
2013-11-01 18:24     ` Dilger, Andreas [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CE98BD77.7C15F%andreas.dilger@intel.com \
    --to=andreas.dilger@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.