From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 50308E006EA; Wed, 9 Jul 2014 07:37:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no * trust * [216.82.251.1 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable relay lines Received: from mail1.bemta12.messagelabs.com (mail1.bemta12.messagelabs.com [216.82.251.1]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE012E006B9 for ; Wed, 9 Jul 2014 07:37:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [216.82.249.147:60243] by server-1.bemta-12.messagelabs.com id 19/BA-27691-1C35DB35; Wed, 09 Jul 2014 14:37:53 +0000 X-Env-Sender: Seth.Bollinger@digi.com X-Msg-Ref: server-9.tower-29.messagelabs.com!1404916672!29254615!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.77.174.14] X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.11.3; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 26930 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2014 14:37:53 -0000 Received: from mail.mx2.digi.com (HELO mcl-sms-ns2.DIGI.COM) (66.77.174.14) by server-9.tower-29.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 9 Jul 2014 14:37:53 -0000 Received: from MTK-SMS-XCH03.digi.com (10.10.8.197) by mail.mx2.digi.com (172.16.1.14) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.342.0; Wed, 9 Jul 2014 09:37:55 -0500 Received: from MTK-SMS-XCH01.digi.com ([fe80::cca7:5299:c88e:1c40]) by MTK-SMS-XCH03.digi.com ([fe80::484d:c326:e7f1:a9fd%25]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.001; Wed, 9 Jul 2014 09:37:51 -0500 From: "Bollinger, Seth" To: "yocto@yoctoproject.org" Thread-Topic: Inadvertent RootFS permission pollution Thread-Index: AQHPm4NcfbAjuNVqS0iFUu+j4fS2CQ== Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2014 14:37:50 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.4.1.140326 x-originating-ip: [10.10.32.65] x-kse-antivirus-interceptor-info: scan successful x-kse-antivirus-info: Clean MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Inadvertent RootFS permission pollution X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2014 14:37:59 -0000 Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <7CDB9906D01E9A40B1E4501309D75B57@digi.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, I recently ran into a problem where I had trouble determining why the setgi= d bit was set in my rootfs. It turns out that debian has this bit set on /= usr/local (where I was building from), and thus inherited this bit from tha= t directory tree. This surprised me, so I thought I would pass it along in= case it saves anyone else some time. Thanks, Seth