All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Nicholas Piggin" <npiggin@gmail.com>
To: "Aaron Conole" <aconole@redhat.com>
Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <dev@openvswitch.org>,
	"Ilya Maximets" <imaximet@redhat.com>,
	"Eelco Chaudron" <echaudro@redhat.com>,
	"Flavio Leitner" <fbl@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [RFC PATCH 4/7] net: openvswitch: ovs_vport_receive reduce stack usage
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2023 17:00:24 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CVV7HCQYCVOP.2JVVJCKU57CAW@wheely> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f7tfs2ymi8y.fsf@redhat.com>

On Fri Sep 29, 2023 at 1:26 AM AEST, Aaron Conole wrote:
> Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > Dynamically allocating the sw_flow_key reduces stack usage of
> > ovs_vport_receive from 544 bytes to 64 bytes at the cost of
> > another GFP_ATOMIC allocation in the receive path.
> >
> > XXX: is this a problem with memory reserves if ovs is in a
> > memory reclaim path, or since we have a skb allocated, is it
> > okay to use some GFP_ATOMIC reserves?
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
> > ---
>
> This represents a fairly large performance hit.  Just my own quick
> testing on a system using two netns, iperf3, and simple forwarding rules
> shows between 2.5% and 4% performance reduction on x86-64.  Note that it
> is a simple case, and doesn't involve a more involved scenario like
> multiple bridges, tunnels, and internal ports.  I suspect such cases
> will see even bigger hit.
>
> I don't know the impact of the other changes, but just an FYI that the
> performance impact of this change is extremely noticeable on x86
> platform.

Thanks for the numbers. This patch is probably the biggest perf cost,
but unfortunately it's also about the biggest saving. I might have an
idea to improve it.

Thanks,
Nick

  reply	other threads:[~2023-09-29  7:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-09-27  0:13 [RFC PATCH 0/7] net: openvswitch: Reduce stack usage Nicholas Piggin
2023-09-27  0:13 ` [RFC PATCH 1/7] net: openvswitch: Move NSH buffer out of do_execute_actions Nicholas Piggin
2023-09-27  8:26   ` [ovs-dev] " Ilya Maximets
2023-09-27 10:03     ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-09-27  0:13 ` [RFC PATCH 2/7] net: openvswitch: Reduce execute_push_nsh stack overhead Nicholas Piggin
2023-09-27  0:13 ` [RFC PATCH 3/7] net: openvswitch: uninline action execution Nicholas Piggin
2023-09-27  0:13 ` [RFC PATCH 4/7] net: openvswitch: ovs_vport_receive reduce stack usage Nicholas Piggin
2023-09-28 15:26   ` [ovs-dev] " Aaron Conole
2023-09-29  7:00     ` Nicholas Piggin [this message]
2023-09-29  8:38       ` Eelco Chaudron
2023-10-04  7:11         ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-10-04 15:15           ` Aaron Conole
2023-10-05  2:01         ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-10-11 13:34           ` Aaron Conole
2023-10-11 23:58             ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-10-04  7:29     ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-10-04 15:16       ` Aaron Conole
2023-09-27  0:13 ` [RFC PATCH 5/7] net: openvswitch: uninline ovs_fragment to control " Nicholas Piggin
2023-09-27  0:13 ` [RFC PATCH 6/7] net: openvswitch: Reduce ovs_fragment " Nicholas Piggin
2023-09-27  0:13 ` [RFC PATCH 7/7] net: openvswitch: Reduce stack usage in ovs_dp_process_packet Nicholas Piggin
2023-09-27 15:22   ` kernel test robot
2023-09-27  8:36 ` [ovs-dev] [RFC PATCH 0/7] net: openvswitch: Reduce stack usage Ilya Maximets
2023-09-28  1:52   ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-10-02 11:54     ` Ilya Maximets
2023-10-04  9:56       ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-09-29  7:06   ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-10-02 11:56     ` Ilya Maximets
2023-10-03 13:31       ` Aaron Conole

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CVV7HCQYCVOP.2JVVJCKU57CAW@wheely \
    --to=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=aconole@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@openvswitch.org \
    --cc=echaudro@redhat.com \
    --cc=fbl@redhat.com \
    --cc=imaximet@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.