From: "Nicholas Piggin" <npiggin@gmail.com>
To: "Thomas Huth" <thuth@redhat.com>,
"Andrew Jones" <andrew.jones@linux.dev>,
"Alexandru Elisei" <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
"Eric Auger" <eric.auger@redhat.com>, <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <kvmarm@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH] lib/arm/io: Fix calling getchar() multiple times
Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2024 00:28:01 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CZ7FAVZ6J6DF.22SLKG0NAG6HL@wheely> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240216140210.70280-1-thuth@redhat.com>
On Sat Feb 17, 2024 at 12:02 AM AEST, Thomas Huth wrote:
> getchar() can currently only be called once on arm since the implementation
> is a little bit too naïve: After the first character has arrived, the
> data register never gets set to zero again. To properly check whether a
> byte is available, we need to check the "RX fifo empty" on the pl011 UART
> or the "RX data ready" bit on the ns16550a UART instead.
>
> With this proper check in place, we can finally also get rid of the
> ugly assert(count < 16) statement here.
>
Thanks, this seems to work well. But arm64 still behaves strangely
with QEMU migration. It seems some odd corruption around __getchar,
but this turns out not to have anything to do with the MMIO read,
but it's just because the test case generally is spinning there
when a migration happens.
I modified __getchar() to the following, which removes the MMIO
entirely and just waits a number of times called before returning
a getchar, chosen to be enough time for QEMU migration to complete
on my system...
int __getchar(void)
{
static int i;
static volatile int locked;
int ret = -1;
assert(!locked);
locked = 1;
assert(locked);
cpu_relax();
assert(locked);
i++;
if (i >= 3000000) {
i = 0;
ret = 1;
}
assert(locked);
locked = 0;
assert(!locked);
return ret;
}
I get asserts on the line right after cpu_relax() on arm64 after a
few migrations on migration selftest.
Without the cpu_relax() it takes longer to hit an assert and it's
usually the first one. I expect this is related to TCG translation
blocks and where it exits back to be migrated. Something is very
strange, I suspect it's QEMU migration bug.
Thanks,
Nick
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-17 14:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-16 14:02 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH] lib/arm/io: Fix calling getchar() multiple times Thomas Huth
2024-02-17 10:43 ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-02-19 6:59 ` Thomas Huth
2024-02-19 11:58 ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-02-19 13:46 ` Andrew Jones
2024-02-17 14:28 ` Nicholas Piggin [this message]
2024-02-19 14:22 ` Andrew Jones
2024-02-19 16:56 ` Alexandru Elisei
2024-02-20 1:37 ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-02-20 8:51 ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-02-20 10:22 ` Alexandru Elisei
2024-02-21 3:39 ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-02-21 7:42 ` Andrew Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CZ7FAVZ6J6DF.22SLKG0NAG6HL@wheely \
--to=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
--cc=andrew.jones@linux.dev \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.