From: Kumar Gala <kumar.gala@freescale.com>
To: Yuji Nishimura <yujin@pp.iij4u.or.jp>
Cc: linuxppc-embedded <linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org>,
Stefan Nickl <Stefan.Nickl@kontron.com>
Subject: Re: Stability of network/io on MPC8540ADS?
Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 13:52:13 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <D0320B10-A5D7-11D8-AB97-000393DBC2E8@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <40A515E2.30401@pp.iij4u.or.jp>
Y.Nishimura ,
It looks like the patch was not included in your email. I would
appreciate seeing it and evaluating if it is something we should
include in the stock kernel.
- kumar
On May 14, 2004, at 1:54 PM, Yuji Nishimura wrote:
>
> Helo Stefan,
>
> I evaluated MPC8540ADS and found out similar problem few weeks ago. I
> made tiny patch and it works well.
> I also evaluated with NEC ehci pci device. The result was fine.
> I wrote 1GB data to external usb-2.0 HDD via USB-2.0(ehci), that works
> well.
> I also try to use ftp(MPC8540=server) and transfer (R/W) 2047MB data
> via
> TSEC(gianfar) and it also works well.
> If you try to use this patch, please let me know. I think patch
> requires
> more evaluation...
>
> Best Regards,
> Y.Nishimura - Tokyo, Japan.
>
>
>
> Stefan Nickl wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> since the linuxppc-2.4 port to our custom 8540 board
>> has made some progress now, I went back to the ADS
>> board for some cross-checking.
>>
>> I've experienced several reproducible lockups that
>> are triggered by heavy IO and/or networking.
>>
>> Kernel is vanilla linuxppc-2.4.27-pre2, gcc 3.2.3,
>> root=/dev/nfs (Gentoo -Os -mcpu=603e)
>>
>> 1) Using netcat to write data over tcp:
>> cat /dev/zero | nc lucy 3000
>>
>> "lucy" is running "nc -l -p 3000 |pipeworks > /dev/null"
>> This freezes the ADS after a few seconds.
>>
>> 2) Writing to the nfsroot server:
>> cat /dev/urandom > /test
>>
>> The same. Reading seems ok.
>>
>> 3) Writing to a USB2.0 HDD connected via PCI
>> interface board (OHCI compatible).
>>
>> Lockup after ~70MB of writing
>>
>> I haven't tested explicitly, but the kernel that
>> was shipped with the board (some 2.4.20?) didn't
>> seem to have such problems.
>>
>> Any ideas?
>>
>> --
>> Stefan Nickl
>> Kontron Modular Computers
>>
>>
>>
>
>
** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-05-14 18:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-05-13 15:27 Stability of network/io on MPC8540ADS? Stefan Nickl
2004-05-13 22:55 ` Kumar Gala
2004-05-14 18:54 ` Yuji Nishimura
2004-05-14 18:52 ` Kumar Gala [this message]
2004-05-14 19:11 ` Yuji Nishimura
2004-05-17 6:48 ` Stefan Nickl
2004-05-17 21:42 ` Kumar Gala
2004-05-17 22:16 ` Wolfgang Denk
2004-05-17 23:24 ` Dan Malek
2004-05-18 13:39 ` Kumar Gala
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=D0320B10-A5D7-11D8-AB97-000393DBC2E8@freescale.com \
--to=kumar.gala@freescale.com \
--cc=Stefan.Nickl@kontron.com \
--cc=linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org \
--cc=yujin@pp.iij4u.or.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.