From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael Kuriger Subject: Re: who is using radosgw with civetweb? Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 15:32:26 +0000 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Content-ID: <08A3CCC3BB62594198E9807165473E78-CivJcMWXhi0@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ceph-users-bounces-idqoXFIVOFJgJs9I8MT0rw@public.gmane.org Sender: "ceph-users" To: Sage Weil , Robert LeBlanc Cc: ceph-devel , Ceph-User List-Id: ceph-devel.vger.kernel.org I=B9d also like to set this up. I=B9m not sure where to begin. When you s= ay enabled by default, where is it enabled? Many thanks, Mike On 2/25/15, 1:49 PM, "Sage Weil" wrote: >On Wed, 25 Feb 2015, Robert LeBlanc wrote: >> We tried to get radosgw working with Apache + mod_fastcgi, but due to >> the changes in radosgw, Apache, mode_*cgi, etc and the documentation >> lagging and not having a lot of time to devote to it, we abandoned it. >> Where it the documentation for civetweb? If it is appliance like and >> easy to set-up, we would like to try it to offer some feedback on your >> question. > >In giant and hammer, it is enabled by default on port 7480. On firefly, >you need to add the line > > rgw frontends =3D fastcgi, civetweb port=3D7480 > >to ceph.conf (you can of course adjust the port number if you like) and >radosgw will run standalone w/ no apache or anything else. > >sage > > >> = >> Thanks, >> Robert LeBlanc >> = >> On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 12:31 PM, Sage Weil wrote: >> > Hey, >> > >> > We are considering switching to civetweb (the embedded/standalone rgw >>web >> > server) as the primary supported RGW frontend instead of the current >> > apache + mod-fastcgi or mod-proxy-fcgi approach. "Supported" here >>means >> > both the primary platform the upstream development focuses on and >>what the >> > downstream Red Hat product will officially support. >> > >> > How many people are using RGW standalone using the embedded civetweb >> > server instead of apache? In production? At what scale? What >> > version(s) (civetweb first appeared in firefly and we've backported >>most >> > fixes). >> > >> > Have you seen any problems? Any other feedback? The hope is to >>(vastly) >> > simplify deployment. >> > >> > Thanks! >> > sage >> > _______________________________________________ >> > ceph-users mailing list >> > ceph-users-idqoXFIVOFJgJs9I8MT0rw@public.gmane.org >> > = >>https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=3Dhttp-3A__lists.ceph.com_list= in >>fo.cgi_ceph-2Dusers-2Dceph.com&d=3DAwICAg&c=3DlXkdEK1PC7UK9oKA-BBSI8p1Aam= zLOS >>ncm6Vfn0C_UQ&r=3DCSYA9OS6Qd7fQySI2LDvlQ&m=3DkDLPSKEyNK6uMLfvU8U7GTva3RMuf= Ab9w >>81RjI2K1ZU&s=3DVsyJ8UHWG0ApL86WXaeD5eOV5SRA7VmGeSkKGws3qMI&e=3D >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in >> the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org >> More majordomo info at >>https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=3Dhttp-3A__vger.kernel.org_maj= or >>domo-2Dinfo.html&d=3DAwICAg&c=3DlXkdEK1PC7UK9oKA-BBSI8p1AamzLOSncm6Vfn0C_= UQ&r >>=3DCSYA9OS6Qd7fQySI2LDvlQ&m=3DkDLPSKEyNK6uMLfvU8U7GTva3RMufAb9w81RjI2K1ZU= &s=3Di >>RNo1K7oJZ-14R-LWuNvEI0WoOr5UuaDkm3IQx77VIo&e=3D >> = >> = >_______________________________________________ >ceph-users mailing list >ceph-users-idqoXFIVOFJgJs9I8MT0rw@public.gmane.org >https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=3Dhttp-3A__lists.ceph.com_listi= nf >o.cgi_ceph-2Dusers-2Dceph.com&d=3DAwICAg&c=3DlXkdEK1PC7UK9oKA-BBSI8p1AamzL= OSnc >m6Vfn0C_UQ&r=3DCSYA9OS6Qd7fQySI2LDvlQ&m=3DkDLPSKEyNK6uMLfvU8U7GTva3RMufAb9= w81R >jI2K1ZU&s=3DVsyJ8UHWG0ApL86WXaeD5eOV5SRA7VmGeSkKGws3qMI&e=3D =