Re: [RFC PATCH v4 net-next 1/4] tcp: replace cnt & rtt with struct in pkts_acked()

[Lawrence Brakmo <brakmo@fb.com>]

On 7/27/15, 11:46 AM, "Stephen Hemminger" <stephen@networkplumber.org>
wrote:

>On Fri, 24 Jul 2015 19:47:03 -0700
>Lawrence Brakmo <brakmo@fb.com> wrote:
>
>> Replace 2 arguments (cnt and rtt) in the congestion control modules'
>> pkts_acked() function with a struct. This will allow adding more
>> information without having to modify existing congestion control
>> modules (tcp_nv in particular needs bytes in flight when packet
>> was sent).
>> 
>> As proposed by Neal Cardwell in his comments to the tcp_nv patch.
>
>Adding a layer of indirection makes code changes easier, but makes
>the code slower. Arguments are passed in registers, and putting an
>additional level of indirection only matters if you can't change
>all the CC modules. Since this is the kernel and API compatability
>doesn't matter, just pass more arguments.

I prefer the cleanliness of passing a structure and don¹t think the
overhead will be significant enough to worry about it.
Will the compiler pass struct values in registers if the struct is
passed by value?

I will be happy to do it either way (I did it like Stephen proposes
originally). What does everyone else think?

>--
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
>the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html