From: "Jarkko Sakkinen" <jarkko@kernel.org>
To: "Matthew R. Ochs" <mochs@nvidia.com>, <peterhuewe@gmx.de>,
<jgg@ziepe.ca>, <kyarlagadda@nvidia.com>,
<linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <va@nvidia.com>, <csoto@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tpm_tis_spi: Account for SPI header when allocating TPM SPI xfer buffer
Date: Tue, 21 May 2024 18:55:14 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <D1FG0VPIBMJI.2XLL7FD5DYXBX@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240521154028.3339742-1-mochs@nvidia.com>
On Tue May 21, 2024 at 6:40 PM EEST, Matthew R. Ochs wrote:
> The TPM SPI transfer mechanism uses MAX_SPI_FRAMESIZE for computing the
> maximum transfer length and the size of the transfer buffer. As such, it
> does not account for the 4 bytes of header that prepends the SPI data
> frame. This can result in out-of-bounds accesses and was confirmed with
> KASAN.
>
> Introduce MAX_SPI_BUFSIZE to account for the header and use to allocate
> the transfer buffer.
>
> Fixes: a86a42ac2bd6 ("tpm_tis_spi: Add hardware wait polling")
> Signed-off-by: Matthew R. Ochs <mochs@nvidia.com>
> Tested-by: Carol Soto <csoto@nvidia.com>
> ---
> drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_spi_main.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_spi_main.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_spi_main.c
> index 3f9eaf27b41b..ba50eaead9d8 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_spi_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_spi_main.c
> @@ -37,6 +37,8 @@
> #include "tpm_tis_spi.h"
>
> #define MAX_SPI_FRAMESIZE 64
> +#define MAX_SPI_HDRSIZE 4
> +#define MAX_SPI_BUFSIZE (MAX_SPI_HDRSIZE + MAX_SPI_FRAMESIZE)
"MAX_" prefix does not make sense in the new entries.
>
> /*
> * TCG SPI flow control is documented in section 6.4 of the spec[1]. In short,
> @@ -247,7 +249,7 @@ static int tpm_tis_spi_write_bytes(struct tpm_tis_data *data, u32 addr,
> int tpm_tis_spi_init(struct spi_device *spi, struct tpm_tis_spi_phy *phy,
> int irq, const struct tpm_tis_phy_ops *phy_ops)
> {
> - phy->iobuf = devm_kmalloc(&spi->dev, MAX_SPI_FRAMESIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
> + phy->iobuf = devm_kmalloc(&spi->dev, MAX_SPI_BUFSIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
It would better to open code here "SPI_HDRSIZE + MAX_SPI_FRAMESIZE".
I.e. less cross-referencing and documents better what is going on at
the call site.
> if (!phy->iobuf)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
BR, Jarkko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-21 15:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-21 15:40 [PATCH] tpm_tis_spi: Account for SPI header when allocating TPM SPI xfer buffer Matthew R. Ochs
2024-05-21 15:55 ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]
2024-05-21 17:59 ` Matt Ochs
2024-05-21 18:57 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2024-05-22 1:59 ` [PATCH v2] " Matthew R. Ochs
2024-05-22 12:04 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=D1FG0VPIBMJI.2XLL7FD5DYXBX@kernel.org \
--to=jarkko@kernel.org \
--cc=csoto@nvidia.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=kyarlagadda@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mochs@nvidia.com \
--cc=peterhuewe@gmx.de \
--cc=va@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.