From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ben Evans Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2015 13:58:15 +0000 Subject: [lustre-devel] LU-6402 MODULE_AUTHOR changes Message-ID: List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org My personal preference would be for OpenSFS to be listed, since Lustre development is a community effort, rather than a product of any specific company. For example, I?d have no problem with Intel?s name on their next-gen interconnect lnd code, or with Cray?s name on the GNI code, etc. but the core parts of Lustre should belong to OpenSFS or EOFS. -Ben Evans From: lustre-devel > on behalf of "Simmons, James A." > Date: Wednesday, September 2, 2015 at 5:29 PM To: "lustre-devel at lists.lustre.org" > Subject: [lustre-devel] LU-6402 MODULE_AUTHOR changes For the LU-6402 the modinfo is pretty stale so I send up a patch at http://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/16132. Andreas brought the topic of who should the MODULE_AUTHOR be. Currently it is Sun Inc which is not the case. I changed it to Intel but not might not be the right choice anymore. So what should the MODULE_AUTHOR be? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: