All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Wiles, Keith" <keith.wiles@intel.com>
To: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Network Stack discussion notes from 2015 DPDK Userspace
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2015 23:19:06 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <D23E0732.5942%keith.wiles@intel.com> (raw)

Here are some notes from the DPDK Network Stack discussion, I can remember please help me fill in anything I missed.

Items I remember we talked about:

  *   The only reason for a DPDK TCP/IP stack is for performance and possibly lower latency
     *   Meaning the developer is willing to re-write or write his application to get the best performance.
  *   A TCP/IPv4/v6 stack is the minimum stack we need to support applications linked with DPDK.
     *   SCTP is also another protocol that maybe required
     *   TCP is the primary protocol, usage model for most use cases
     *   Stack must be able to terminate TCP traffic to an application linked to DPDK
  *   For DPDK the customer is looking for fast applications and is willing to write the application just for DPDK network stack
     *   Converting an existing application could  be done, but the design is for performance and may require a lot of changes to an application
     *   Using an application API that is not Socket is fine for high performance and maybe the only way we get best performance.
     *   Need to supply a Socket layer interface as a option if customer is willing to take a performance hit instead of rewriting the application
  *   Native application acceleration is desired, but not required when using DPDK network stack
  *   We have two projects related to network stack in DPDK
     *   The first one is porting some TCP/IP stack to DPDK plus it needs to give a reasonable performance increase over native Linux applications
        *   The stack code needs to be BSD/MIT like licensed (Open Sourced)
        *   The stack should be up to date with the latest RFCs or at least close
        *   A stack could be written for DPDK (not using a existing code base) and its environment for best performance
        *   Need to be able to configure the DPDK stack(s) from the Linux command line tools if possible
        *   Need a DPDK specific application layer API for application to interface with the network stack
        *   Could have a socket layer API on top of the specific API for applications needing to use sockets (not expected to be the best performance)
     *   The second item is figuring out a new IPC for East/West traffic within the same system.
        *   The design needs to improve performance between applications and be transparent to the application when the remote end is not on the same system.
        *   The new IPC path should be agnostic to local or remote end points
        *   Needs to be very fast compared to current Linux IPC designs. (Will OVS work here?)

Did I miss any details or comments, please reply and help me correct the comment or understanding.

Thanks for everyone attending and packing into a small space.

—
Regards,
++Keith Wiles
Intel Corporation

             reply	other threads:[~2015-10-09 23:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-09 23:19 Wiles, Keith [this message]
2015-10-12  8:50 ` Network Stack discussion notes from 2015 DPDK Userspace Avi Kivity
2015-10-13  4:02 ` Vincent Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=D23E0732.5942%keith.wiles@intel.com \
    --to=keith.wiles@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.