From: Lars Kurth <lars.kurth@citrix.com>
To: George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@citrix.com>,
"xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Cc: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>, "Keir (Xen.org)" <keir@xen.org>,
Andrew Cooper <Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com>,
"Tim (Xen.org)" <tim@xen.org>, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>,
Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Clarify the meaning of nested maintainership
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 16:59:00 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <D33EC422.286F0%lars.kurth@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1461254590-5984-1-git-send-email-george.dunlap@citrix.com>
On 21/04/2016 17:03, "George Dunlap" <george.dunlap@citrix.com> wrote:
>Clarify the meaning of nested maintainership.
>
>Signed-off-by: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@citrix.com>
>---
>
> MAINTAINERS | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+)
>
>diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
>index a34685d..be901d5 100644
>--- a/MAINTAINERS
>+++ b/MAINTAINERS
>@@ -94,6 +94,40 @@ Descriptions of section entries:
> printk, pr_info or pr_err
> One regex pattern per line. Multiple K: lines acceptable.
>
>+
>+The meaning of nesting:
>+
>
>[snip]
>+ - In the case of a disagreement between maintainers, THE REST can
>+ vote to settle the matter. (This should be very exceptional indeed.)
This creates a slight conflict with the project governance, which states
that committers act as referees in case of disagreements. As REST
maintainers are a superset of committers, this could create a potential
mismatch.
Given, that the text says "can", I don't have an issue with it. It merely
adds an extra level of complexity when it comes to resolving disagreements
and maybe could be confusing.
Regards
Lars
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-21 16:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-21 16:03 [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Clarify the meaning of nested maintainership George Dunlap
2016-04-21 16:59 ` Lars Kurth [this message]
2016-04-26 16:19 ` George Dunlap
2016-04-26 16:57 ` Lars Kurth
2016-04-27 11:34 ` George Dunlap
2016-04-22 3:55 ` Juergen Gross
2016-04-22 8:29 ` Jan Beulich
2016-04-22 16:33 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-04-22 18:33 ` Julien Grall
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=D33EC422.286F0%lars.kurth@citrix.com \
--to=lars.kurth@citrix.com \
--cc=Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=George.Dunlap@citrix.com \
--cc=Ian.Jackson@citrix.com \
--cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=keir@xen.org \
--cc=tim@xen.org \
--cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.