All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jarkko Sakkinen" <jarkko@kernel.org>
To: "Aaron Lu" <aaron.lu@intel.com>,
	"Dave Hansen" <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: <x86@kernel.org>, <linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Zhimin Luo" <zhimin.luo@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/sgx: Fix deadloop in __sgx_alloc_epc_page()
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2024 19:44:13 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <D3SJOVADFM48.JNOIOZJ0J6OE@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240829023800.1671210-1-aaron.lu@intel.com>

On Thu Aug 29, 2024 at 5:38 AM EEST, Aaron Lu wrote:
> When current node doesn't have a EPC section configured by firmware and
> all other EPC sections memory are used up, CPU can stuck inside the
> while loop in __sgx_alloc_epc_page() forever and soft lockup will happen.
> Note how nid_of_current will never equal to nid in that while loop because
                                                     ~~~~

Oh *that* while loop ;-) Please be more specific.

> nid_of_current is not set in sgx_numa_mask.
>
> Also worth mentioning is that it's perfectly fine for firmware to not
> seup an EPC section on a node. Setting an EPC section on each node can
> be good for performance but that's not a requirement functionality wise.

This lacks any description of what is done to __sgx_alloc_epc_page().

>
> Fixes: 901ddbb9ecf5 ("x86/sgx: Add a basic NUMA allocation scheme to sgx_alloc_epc_page()")
> Reported-by: Zhimin Luo <zhimin.luo@intel.com>
> Tested-by: Zhimin Luo <zhimin.luo@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>

BR, Jarkko

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-08-29 16:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-08-29  2:38 [PATCH] x86/sgx: Fix deadloop in __sgx_alloc_epc_page() Aaron Lu
2024-08-29  7:47 ` Huang, Kai
2024-08-29  7:56 ` Huang, Kai
2024-08-29 13:22   ` Aaron Lu
2024-08-29 15:17 ` Dave Hansen
2024-08-30  6:02   ` Aaron Lu
2024-08-30 14:03     ` Dave Hansen
2024-09-02  7:57       ` Aaron Lu
2024-08-29 16:44 ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]
2024-08-30  6:14   ` Aaron Lu
2024-09-03 16:05     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2024-09-04  1:39       ` Aaron Lu
2024-09-04 14:17         ` Jarkko Sakkinen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=D3SJOVADFM48.JNOIOZJ0J6OE@kernel.org \
    --to=jarkko@kernel.org \
    --cc=aaron.lu@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=zhimin.luo@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.