From: "Jarkko Sakkinen" <jarkko@kernel.org>
To: "Aaron Lu" <aaron.lu@intel.com>,
"Dave Hansen" <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
"Kai Huang" <kai.huang@intel.com>
Cc: "Molina Sabido, Gerardo" <gerardo.molina.sabido@intel.com>,
"Zhimin Luo" <zhimin.luo@intel.com>, <linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <x86@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] x86/sgx: Fix deadlock in SGX NUMA node search
Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2024 17:21:54 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <D3YF1PO93RI0.2V31UQ4D620TT@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240905080855.1699814-2-aaron.lu@intel.com>
On Thu Sep 5, 2024 at 11:08 AM EEST, Aaron Lu wrote:
> When the current node doesn't have an EPC section configured by firmware
> and all other EPC sections are used up, CPU can get stuck inside the
> while loop that looks for an available EPC page from remote nodes
> indefinitely, leading to a soft lockup. Note how nid_of_current will
> never be equal to nid in that while loop because nid_of_current is not
> set in sgx_numa_mask.
>
> Also worth mentioning is that it's perfectly fine for the firmware not
> to setup an EPC section on a node. While setting up an EPC section on
> each node can enhance performance, it is not a requirement for
> functionality.
>
> Rework the loop to start and end on *a* node that has SGX memory. This
> avoids the deadlock looking for the current SGX-lacking node to show up
> in the loop when it never will.
>
> Fixes: 901ddbb9ecf5 ("x86/sgx: Add a basic NUMA allocation scheme to sgx_alloc_epc_page()")
> Reported-by: "Molina Sabido, Gerardo" <gerardo.molina.sabido@intel.com>
> Tested-by: Zhimin Luo <zhimin.luo@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>
> Acked-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/main.c | 27 ++++++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/main.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/main.c
> index 1a000acd933a..694fcf7a5e3a 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/main.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/main.c
> @@ -475,24 +475,25 @@ struct sgx_epc_page *__sgx_alloc_epc_page(void)
> {
> struct sgx_epc_page *page;
> int nid_of_current = numa_node_id();
> - int nid = nid_of_current;
> + int nid_start, nid;
>
> - if (node_isset(nid_of_current, sgx_numa_mask)) {
> - page = __sgx_alloc_epc_page_from_node(nid_of_current);
> - if (page)
> - return page;
> - }
> -
> - /* Fall back to the non-local NUMA nodes: */
> - while (true) {
> - nid = next_node_in(nid, sgx_numa_mask);
> - if (nid == nid_of_current)
> - break;
> + /*
> + * Try local node first. If it doesn't have an EPC section,
> + * fall back to the non-local NUMA nodes.
> + */
> + if (node_isset(nid_of_current, sgx_numa_mask))
> + nid_start = nid_of_current;
> + else
> + nid_start = next_node_in(nid_of_current, sgx_numa_mask);
>
> + nid = nid_start;
> + do {
> page = __sgx_alloc_epc_page_from_node(nid);
> if (page)
> return page;
> - }
> +
> + nid = next_node_in(nid, sgx_numa_mask);
> + } while (nid != nid_start);
>
> return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> }
Looks good to me:
Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
BR, Jarkko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-05 14:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-05 8:08 [PATCH v2 0/2] SGX NUMA fix Aaron Lu
2024-09-05 8:08 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] x86/sgx: Fix deadlock in SGX NUMA node search Aaron Lu
2024-09-05 14:21 ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]
2024-09-05 8:08 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] x86/sgx: Log information when a node lacks an EPC section Aaron Lu
2024-09-05 14:24 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2024-09-05 19:02 ` Dave Hansen
2024-09-05 22:16 ` Huang, Kai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=D3YF1PO93RI0.2V31UQ4D620TT@kernel.org \
--to=jarkko@kernel.org \
--cc=aaron.lu@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=gerardo.molina.sabido@intel.com \
--cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=zhimin.luo@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.