From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Lvf1G-00072k-3x
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 19 Apr 2009 17:57:46 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Lvf1A-00072Q-IQ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 19 Apr 2009 17:57:44 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=35758 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Lvf1A-00072N-Dg
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 19 Apr 2009 17:57:40 -0400
Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:58604)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <herbszt@gmx.de>) id 1Lvf19-00055j-Nu
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 19 Apr 2009 17:57:40 -0400
Message-ID: <D72513CCDA124965A247506823CF4646@FSCPC>
From: "Sebastian Herbszt" <herbszt@gmx.de>
References: <1240001860-2280-1-git-send-email-glommer@redhat.com><1240001860-2280-2-git-send-email-glommer@redhat.com><D0EACBF925E544E9A23947F700322478@FSCPC><b1ebdcad0904181831o586157c0m73f6d143f40c1fea@mail.gmail.com>
	<20090419111249.GD10126@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20090419111249.GD10126@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 23:55:57 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
	reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [Bochs-developers] [PATCH 1/2] create acpi cpu
	definitions
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>, Brendan Trotter <btrotter@gmail.com>
Cc: bochs-developers@lists.sourceforge.net, aliguori@us.ibm.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Gleb Natapov wrote:
> Windows 2008 supports CPU hot plug (but not unplug IIRC). How they do it
> if there is not specification about how it should work on 80x86?

Any clue if cpu hotplug support implemented by this patch was tested with
Linux and/or Windows 2008 guests?

- Sebastian