From: "Nicholas Piggin" <npiggin@gmail.com>
To: "Chalapathi V" <chalapathi.v@linux.ibm.com>, <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Cc: <qemu-ppc@nongnu.org>, <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com>, <clg@kaod.org>,
<calebs@linux.ibm.com>, <chalapathi.v@ibm.com>,
<saif.abrar@linux.ibm.com>, <dantan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
<milesg@linux.ibm.com>, <philmd@linaro.org>,
<alistair@alistair23.me>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/4] hw/ssi/pnv_spi: Put a limit to RDR match failures
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2025 11:56:54 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <D82USMP2EKXB.1LFUGZQZKVFL2@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250103161824.22469-5-chalapathi.v@linux.ibm.com>
On Sat Jan 4, 2025 at 2:18 AM AEST, Chalapathi V wrote:
> There is a possibility that SPI controller can get into loop due to indefinite
> RDR match failures. Hence put a limit to failures and stop the sequencer.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chalapathi V <chalapathi.v@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> hw/ssi/pnv_spi.c | 11 +++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/hw/ssi/pnv_spi.c b/hw/ssi/pnv_spi.c
> index 41beb559c6..d605fa8b46 100644
> --- a/hw/ssi/pnv_spi.c
> +++ b/hw/ssi/pnv_spi.c
> @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
> #define PNV_SPI_OPCODE_LO_NIBBLE(x) (x & 0x0F)
> #define PNV_SPI_MASKED_OPCODE(x) (x & 0xF0)
> #define PNV_SPI_FIFO_SIZE 16
> +#define RDR_MATCH_FAILURE_LIMIT 16
>
> /*
> * Macro from include/hw/ppc/fdt.h
> @@ -838,21 +839,31 @@ static void operation_sequencer(PnvSpi *s)
> */
> if (GETFIELD(SPI_STS_RDR_FULL, s->status) == 1) {
> bool rdr_matched = false;
> + static int fail_count;
This will be shared by SPI instances, is that okay or should it be
in PnvSpi?
Other than that, looks good.
Reviewed-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-27 1:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-03 16:18 [PATCH v5 0/4] hw/ssi/pnv_spi: Remove PnvXferBuffer and fix CID 1558827 Chalapathi V
2025-01-03 16:18 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] hw/ssi/pnv_spi: Replace PnvXferBuffer with Fifo8 structure Chalapathi V
2025-02-27 1:39 ` Nicholas Piggin
2025-02-28 2:59 ` Chalapathi V
2025-01-03 16:18 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] hw/ssi/pnv_spi: Coverity CID 1558827: Use local var seq_index instead of get_seq_index() Chalapathi V
2025-02-27 1:43 ` Nicholas Piggin
2025-02-27 1:44 ` Nicholas Piggin
2025-01-03 16:18 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] hw/ssi/pnv_spi: Make bus names distinct for each controllers of a socket Chalapathi V
2025-02-27 1:54 ` Nicholas Piggin
2025-02-28 3:03 ` Chalapathi V
2025-02-28 7:45 ` Cédric Le Goater
2025-02-28 11:00 ` Chalapathi V
2025-02-28 16:15 ` Cédric Le Goater
2025-01-03 16:18 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] hw/ssi/pnv_spi: Put a limit to RDR match failures Chalapathi V
2025-02-27 1:56 ` Nicholas Piggin [this message]
2025-02-28 3:04 ` Chalapathi V
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=D82USMP2EKXB.1LFUGZQZKVFL2@gmail.com \
--to=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=alistair@alistair23.me \
--cc=calebs@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=chalapathi.v@ibm.com \
--cc=chalapathi.v@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=clg@kaod.org \
--cc=dantan@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=fbarrat@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=milesg@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=philmd@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
--cc=saif.abrar@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.