From: "Benno Lossin" <lossin@kernel.org>
To: "Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@kernel.org>
Cc: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, <rafael@kernel.org>,
<ojeda@kernel.org>, <alex.gaynor@gmail.com>,
<boqun.feng@gmail.com>, <gary@garyguo.net>,
<bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com>, <benno.lossin@proton.me>,
<a.hindborg@kernel.org>, <aliceryhl@google.com>,
<tmgross@umich.edu>, <rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] rust: devres: implement register_foreign_release()
Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2025 22:14:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DATC5A2JBHZQ.33AFQQP6V6L1A@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aFf7QVhqE6dhp0m2@pollux>
On Sun Jun 22, 2025 at 2:46 PM CEST, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 22, 2025 at 09:26:33AM +0200, Benno Lossin wrote:
>> On Thu Jun 12, 2025 at 4:51 PM CEST, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
>> > +pub trait Release {
>> > + /// Called once the [`Device`] given to [`register_foreign_release`] is unbound.
>> > + fn release(&self);
>>
>> Would it make sense to also supply the `Device` that this is attached
>> to? In case you have one object in multiple `register_foreign_release`
>> calls with different devices, or is that something that doesn't happen?
>
> No, doing that wouldn't make any sense. A resource should only be bound to the
> lifetime of a single device.
But the API doesn't prevent it... Does it make more sense to instead ask
the user to provide a closure?
>> > +}
>> > +
>> > +impl<T: Release> Release for crate::sync::ArcBorrow<'_, T> {
>> > + fn release(&self) {
>> > + self.deref().release();
>> > + }
>> > +}
>> > +
>> > +impl<T: Release> Release for Pin<&'_ T> {
>> > + fn release(&self) {
>> > + self.deref().release();
>> > + }
>> > +}
>>
>> We should also implement it for `&T`, since that is `Box`'s `Borrowed`.
>
> That should implicitly be the case when T: Release, where T is P<T>.
I don't understand? When `P` is set to `Box<T>` in the
`register_foreign_release` below, then `P::Borrow<'_> == &'_ T` and the
bound of `&T: Release` is not satisfied.
>> > +
>> > +/// Consume the `data`, [`Release::release`] and [`Drop::drop`] `data` once `dev` is unbound.
>> > +///
>> > +/// # Examples
>> > +///
>> > +/// ```no_run
>> > +/// use kernel::{device::{Bound, Device}, devres, devres::Release, sync::Arc};
>> > +///
>> > +/// struct Registration<T> {
>>
>> Maybe add some explanation above/below this example. It looks like a new
>> bus registration?
>
> *class device registration, see Registration::new() below. But I can also add a
> brief comment to the struct. It's indeed a bit subtly this way. :)
I'd just add a small paragraph explaining what it does :)
---
Cheers,
Benno
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-22 20:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-12 14:51 [PATCH 0/4] Improvements for Devres Danilo Krummrich
2025-06-12 14:51 ` [PATCH 1/4] rust: revocable: support fallible PinInit types Danilo Krummrich
2025-06-12 15:48 ` Benno Lossin
2025-06-12 15:58 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-06-12 16:17 ` Benno Lossin
2025-06-12 16:20 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-06-12 14:51 ` [PATCH 2/4] rust: devres: replace Devres::new_foreign_owned() Danilo Krummrich
2025-06-13 3:14 ` Viresh Kumar
2025-06-21 21:10 ` Benno Lossin
2025-06-21 21:45 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-06-22 7:42 ` Benno Lossin
2025-06-22 9:55 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-06-22 20:18 ` Benno Lossin
2025-06-12 14:51 ` [PATCH 3/4] rust: devres: get rid of Devres' inner Arc Danilo Krummrich
2025-06-22 7:05 ` Benno Lossin
2025-06-22 12:08 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-06-22 20:16 ` Benno Lossin
2025-06-22 15:45 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-06-22 20:15 ` Benno Lossin
2025-06-12 14:51 ` [PATCH 4/4] rust: devres: implement register_foreign_release() Danilo Krummrich
2025-06-22 7:26 ` Benno Lossin
2025-06-22 12:46 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-06-22 20:14 ` Benno Lossin [this message]
2025-06-22 20:25 ` Danilo Krummrich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DATC5A2JBHZQ.33AFQQP6V6L1A@kernel.org \
--to=lossin@kernel.org \
--cc=a.hindborg@kernel.org \
--cc=alex.gaynor@gmail.com \
--cc=aliceryhl@google.com \
--cc=benno.lossin@proton.me \
--cc=bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=gary@garyguo.net \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tmgross@umich.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.