From: "Benno Lossin" <lossin@kernel.org>
To: "Marcelo Moreira" <marcelomoreira1905@gmail.com>
Cc: <aliceryhl@google.com>, <dakr@kernel.org>, <ojeda@kernel.org>,
<rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org>, <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
<linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org>,
<~lkcamp/patches@lists.sr.ht>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/3] rust: revocable: Document RevocableGuard invariants and refine Deref safety
Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2025 10:04:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DB7DACSKLCI6.1YONOEGQZ08T7@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPZ3m_hArv5MA7H4RYRj1FHUaaFF9+2QAuo03xhUKGQ-YZ8uFg@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed Jul 9, 2025 at 12:24 AM CEST, Marcelo Moreira wrote:
> Em ter., 8 de jul. de 2025 às 12:04, Benno Lossin <lossin@kernel.org> escreveu:
>> On Tue Jul 8, 2025 at 2:33 AM CEST, Marcelo Moreira wrote:
>> > pub struct RevocableGuard<'a, T> {
>> > // This can't use the `&'a T` type because references that appear in function arguments must
>> > // not become dangling during the execution of the function, which can happen if the
>> > @@ -258,8 +259,8 @@ impl<T> Deref for RevocableGuard<'_, T> {
>> > type Target = T;
>> >
>> > fn deref(&self) -> &Self::Target {
>> > - // SAFETY: By the type invariants, we hold the rcu read-side lock, so the object is
>> > - // guaranteed to remain valid.
>> > + // SAFETY: `self.data_ref` is valid for writes because of `Self`'s type invariants,
>> > + // and `_rcu_guard` ensures the data's accessibility for the lifetime of this guard.
>>
>> This also needs to be adjusted.
>
> oh, of course, &T is an immutable reference, mb.
>
> What about:
> // SAFETY: `self.data_ref` is valid because of `Self`'s type invariants
> // and the active RCU read-side lock held via `_rcu_guard`, ensuring
> the data's accessibility.
Sounds good.
---
Cheers,
Benno
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-09 8:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-08 0:33 [PATCH v6 0/3] rust: revocable: Documentation and refactorings for Revocable type Marcelo Moreira
2025-07-08 0:33 ` [PATCH v6 1/3] rust: revocable: Clarify write invariant and update safety comments Marcelo Moreira
2025-07-08 0:33 ` [PATCH v6 2/3] rust: revocable: Refactor revocation mechanism to remove generic revoke_internal Marcelo Moreira
2025-07-08 0:33 ` [PATCH v6 3/3] rust: revocable: Document RevocableGuard invariants and refine Deref safety Marcelo Moreira
2025-07-08 15:04 ` Benno Lossin
2025-07-08 22:24 ` Marcelo Moreira
2025-07-09 8:04 ` Benno Lossin [this message]
2025-07-11 23:06 ` Marcelo Moreira
2025-07-12 8:26 ` Benno Lossin
2025-07-12 18:49 ` Marcelo Moreira
2025-07-12 19:56 ` Benno Lossin
2025-07-16 20:11 ` Marcelo Moreira
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DB7DACSKLCI6.1YONOEGQZ08T7@kernel.org \
--to=lossin@kernel.org \
--cc=aliceryhl@google.com \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=marcelomoreira1905@gmail.com \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=~lkcamp/patches@lists.sr.ht \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.