From: "Mathieu Dubois-Briand" <mathieu.dubois-briand@bootlin.com>
To: <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>,
<hongxu.jia@eng.windriver.com>,
<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 4/4] libxml2: upgrade 2.14.3 -> 2.14.5
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2025 15:45:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DBIMOAQO71QQ.13YNCOGP9XB30@bootlin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <65edbfaaa12089b5483042867d663fb46e488b82.camel@linuxfoundation.org>
On Tue Jul 22, 2025 at 3:18 PM CEST, Richard Purdie via lists.openembedded.org wrote:
> On Mon, 2025-07-21 at 16:21 +0800, hongxu via lists.openembedded.org wrote:
>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/libxml/libxml2_2.14.3.bb b/meta/recipes-core/libxml/libxml2_2.14.5.bb
>> similarity index 97%
>> rename from meta/recipes-core/libxml/libxml2_2.14.3.bb
>> rename to meta/recipes-core/libxml/libxml2_2.14.5.bb
>> index 4baab59186e..52b2040122b 100644
>> --- a/meta/recipes-core/libxml/libxml2_2.14.3.bb
>> +++ b/meta/recipes-core/libxml/libxml2_2.14.5.bb
>> @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ SRC_URI += "http://www.w3.org/XML/Test/xmlts20130923.tar;subdir=${BP};name=testt
>> file://CVE-2025-6021.patch \
>> "
>>
>> -SRC_URI[archive.sha256sum] = "6de55cacc8c2bc758f2ef6f93c313cb30e4dd5d84ac5d3c7ccbd9344d8cc6833"
>> +SRC_URI[archive.sha256sum] = "24175ec30a97cfa86bdf9befb7ccf4613f8f4b2713c5103e0dd0bc9c711a2773"
>> SRC_URI[testtar.sha256sum] = "c6b2d42ee50b8b236e711a97d68e6c4b5c8d83e69a2be4722379f08702ea7273"
>>
>> # Disputed as a security issue, but fixed in d39f780
>>
>
> $ wget https://download.gnome.org/sources//libxml2/2.14/libxml2-2.14.5.tar.xz
> $ sha256sum libxml2-2.14.5.tar.xz
> 03d006f3537616833c16c53addcdc32a0eb20e55443cba4038307e3fa7d8d44b libxml2-2.14.5.tar.xz
>
> which would match the failure on:
>
> https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/valkyrie/#/builders/29/builds/2060
>
> Any idea what happened here?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Richard
It looks like the file changed on the remote, my build this morning did
succeed but not the next ones.
--
Mathieu Dubois-Briand, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-22 13:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-21 8:21 [PATCH 1/4] gpgme: upgrade 1.24.3 -> 2.0.0 Hongxu Jia
2025-07-21 8:21 ` [PATCH 2/4] bash: upgrade 5.2.37 -> 5.3 Hongxu Jia
2025-07-23 5:35 ` [OE-core] " Mathieu Dubois-Briand
2025-07-28 3:09 ` Hongxu Jia
2025-07-30 2:32 ` Hongxu Jia
2025-07-21 8:21 ` [PATCH 3/4] readline: 8.2.13 -> 8.3 Hongxu Jia
2025-07-22 1:07 ` [OE-core] " Khem Raj
2025-07-21 8:21 ` [PATCH 4/4] libxml2: upgrade 2.14.3 -> 2.14.5 Hongxu Jia
2025-07-22 13:18 ` [OE-core] " Richard Purdie
2025-07-22 13:45 ` Mathieu Dubois-Briand [this message]
2025-07-22 14:17 ` Richard Purdie
2025-07-23 2:16 ` [PATCH V2] " Hongxu Jia
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DBIMOAQO71QQ.13YNCOGP9XB30@bootlin.com \
--to=mathieu.dubois-briand@bootlin.com \
--cc=hongxu.jia@eng.windriver.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.