All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Leon Hwang" <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
To: "Andrii Nakryiko" <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>
Cc: <bpf@vger.kernel.org>, <ast@kernel.org>, <andrii@kernel.org>,
	<daniel@iogearbox.net>, <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	<yonghong.song@linux.dev>, <song@kernel.org>, <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
	<dxu@dxuuu.xyz>, <deso@posteo.net>, <kernel-patches-bot@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v7 4/7] bpf: Add BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags support for percpu_hash and lru_percpu_hash maps
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2025 22:50:02 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <DCZEVCZLG1IW.2MPQVMF4L3D91@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEf4BzYTse1=pAYcM6y_vKbm74ZDtSu2Daj3sLewvKz16WF9NA@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat Sep 20, 2025 at 6:31 AM +08, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2025 at 10:25 PM Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> >> @@ -1724,7 +1742,7 @@ __htab_map_lookup_and_delete_batch(struct bpf_map *map,
>> >>         value_size = htab->map.value_size;
>> >>         size = round_up(value_size, 8);
>> >>         if (is_percpu)
>> >> -               value_size = size * num_possible_cpus();
>> >> +               value_size = (elem_map_flags & BPF_F_CPU) ? size : size * num_possible_cpus();
>> >
>> > if (is_percpu && !(elem_map_flags & BPF_F_CPU))
>> >     value_size = size * num_possible_cpus();
>> >
>> > ?
>> >
>>
>> After looking at it again, I’d like to keep my approach.
>>
>> When 'elem_map_flags & BPF_F_CPU' is set, 'value_size' has to be
>> assigned to 'size' ('round_up(value_size, 8)') instead of keeping
>> 'htab->map.value_size'.
>>
>
> isn't that what will happen here as well? There is
>
> size = round_up(value_size, 8);
>
> right before that if
>

As for percpu maps, both 'size' and 'value_size' need to be 8-byte
aligned here, because 'map.value_size' itself is not guarenteed to be
aligned.

In 'htab_map_alloc_check()', there is no alignment check for percpu
maps.

So 'map.value_size' can be unaligned.

Let's look at how 'value_size' is used:

values = kvmalloc_array(value_size, bucket_size, GFP_USER | __GFP_NOWARN);
dst_val = values;
hlist_nulls_for_each_entry_safe(l, n, head, hash_node) {
        if (is_percpu) {
                if (elem_map_flags & BPF_F_CPU) {
                        copy_map_value_long(&htab->map, dst_val, per_cpu_ptr(pptr, cpu));
                }
        }
        dst_val += value_size;
}
copy_to_user(uvalues + total * value_size, values,
             value_size * bucket_cnt)

Here, 'value_size' determines how values are laid out and copied.

As a result, when 'is_percpu && (elem_map_flags & BPF_F_CPU)',
'value_size' must be assigned to 'size' in order to make sure it's
8-byte aligned.

Thanks,
Leon

  reply	other threads:[~2025-09-22 14:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-10 16:27 [PATCH bpf-next v7 0/7] bpf: Introduce BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags for percpu maps Leon Hwang
2025-09-10 16:27 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 1/7] bpf: Introduce internal bpf_map_check_op_flags helper function Leon Hwang
2025-09-16 23:44   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-09-10 16:27 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 2/7] bpf: Introduce BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags Leon Hwang
2025-09-16 23:44   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-09-10 16:27 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 3/7] bpf: Add BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags support for percpu_array maps Leon Hwang
2025-09-16 23:44   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-09-17 15:04     ` Leon Hwang
2025-09-10 16:27 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 4/7] bpf: Add BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags support for percpu_hash and lru_percpu_hash maps Leon Hwang
2025-09-16 23:44   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-09-17 15:20     ` Leon Hwang
2025-09-17 19:11       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-09-18 16:07         ` Leon Hwang
2025-09-18 19:52           ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-09-19  5:25     ` Leon Hwang
2025-09-19 22:31       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-09-22 14:50         ` Leon Hwang [this message]
2025-09-22 16:13           ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-09-23  2:45             ` Leon Hwang
2025-09-24 23:47               ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-09-10 16:27 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 5/7] bpf: Add BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags support for percpu_cgroup_storage maps Leon Hwang
2025-09-16 23:44   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-09-17 15:07     ` Leon Hwang
2025-09-17 19:12       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-09-18 15:38         ` Leon Hwang
2025-09-10 16:27 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 6/7] libbpf: Add BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags support for percpu maps Leon Hwang
2025-09-16 23:44   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-09-17 15:25     ` Leon Hwang
2025-09-10 16:27 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 7/7] selftests/bpf: Add cases to test BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags Leon Hwang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=DCZEVCZLG1IW.2MPQVMF4L3D91@linux.dev \
    --to=leon.hwang@linux.dev \
    --cc=andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=deso@posteo.net \
    --cc=dxu@dxuuu.xyz \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel-patches-bot@fb.com \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.