From: "Alexis Lothoré" <alexis.lothore@bootlin.com>
To: "Martin KaFai Lau" <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
"Alexis Lothoré (eBPF Foundation)" <alexis.lothore@bootlin.com>
Cc: "Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@kernel.org>,
"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
"Andrii Nakryiko" <andrii@kernel.org>,
"Eduard Zingerman" <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
"Song Liu" <song@kernel.org>,
"Yonghong Song" <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
"John Fastabend" <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
"KP Singh" <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
"Stanislav Fomichev" <sdf@fomichev.me>,
"Hao Luo" <haoluo@google.com>, "Jiri Olsa" <jolsa@kernel.org>,
"Shuah Khan" <shuah@kernel.org>, <ebpf@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Thomas Petazzoni" <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
"Bastien Curutchet" <bastien.curutchet@bootlin.com>,
<bpf@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 3/4] selftests/bpf: integrate test_tc_tunnel.sh tests into test_progs
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2025 15:04:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DDVPPGIO5P1F.E3DWINA74BJ6@bootlin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1ac9d14e-4250-480c-b863-410be78ac6c6@linux.dev>
Hello Martin,
thanks for the review and the initial merge. I am preparing the follow-up
series.
On Wed Oct 29, 2025 at 8:56 PM CET, Martin KaFai Lau wrote:
> On 10/27/25 7:51 AM, Alexis Lothoré (eBPF Foundation) wrote:
>> +static int run_server(struct subtest_cfg *cfg)
>> +{
>> + struct nstoken *nstoken = open_netns(SERVER_NS);
>
> It is unlikely but still better to check for open_netns failure. Just in
> case that the network changes/traffic is accidentally done in the
> original netns. There are a few netns switching in the test. Please
> followup.
Yes, I'll add those missing checks.
>> + int family = cfg->ipproto == 6 ? AF_INET6 : AF_INET;
>> +
>> + cfg->server_fd = start_reuseport_server(family, SOCK_STREAM,
>> + cfg->server_addr, TEST_PORT,
>> + TIMEOUT_MS, 1);
>
> Why reuseport is needed? Does it have issue in bind() to the same
> ip/port in the later sub-test?
Yes, I observed that is I use the bare start_server, I systematically have
the first test passing, an all the others failing on the server startup
with errno 98 (Address already in use). I have been assuming that it is due
to some TIME_WAIT state on the freshly closed socket, but I may be missing
something ?
Thanks,
Alexis
--
Alexis Lothoré, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-30 14:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-27 14:51 [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/4] selftests/bpf: convert test_tc_tunnel.sh to test_progs Alexis Lothoré (eBPF Foundation)
2025-10-27 14:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/4] selftests/bpf: add tc helpers Alexis Lothoré (eBPF Foundation)
2025-10-27 14:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 2/4] selftests/bpf: make test_tc_tunnel.bpf.c compatible with big endian platforms Alexis Lothoré (eBPF Foundation)
2025-10-27 14:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 3/4] selftests/bpf: integrate test_tc_tunnel.sh tests into test_progs Alexis Lothoré (eBPF Foundation)
2025-10-29 19:56 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-10-30 14:04 ` Alexis Lothoré [this message]
2025-10-30 16:21 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-10-30 16:27 ` Alexis Lothoré
2025-10-27 14:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 4/4] selftests/bpf: remove test_tc_tunnel.sh Alexis Lothoré (eBPF Foundation)
2025-10-29 19:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/4] selftests/bpf: convert test_tc_tunnel.sh to test_progs patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DDVPPGIO5P1F.E3DWINA74BJ6@bootlin.com \
--to=alexis.lothore@bootlin.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bastien.curutchet@bootlin.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=ebpf@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.