From: "Mathieu Dubois-Briand" <mathieu.dubois-briand@bootlin.com>
To: "Tondo, Stefano" <stefano.tondo.ext@siemens.com>,
"Stefano Tondo" <stondo@gmail.com>,
"openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org"
<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Cc: "Marko, Peter" <Peter.Marko@siemens.com>,
"Freihofer, Adrian" <adrian.freihofer@siemens.com>
Subject: Re: [OE-core][PATCH v2] spdx30_tasks: Fix SPDX_CUSTOM_ANNOTATION_VARS implementation
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2025 16:52:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DECSILYBSPUH.3Q482LTJ8SAD9@bootlin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AS4PR10MB51507A3160F4AD577CD35ED4ACD7A@AS4PR10MB5150.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
On Wed Nov 19, 2025 at 1:33 PM CET, Stefano Tondo wrote:
> Hi Mathieu,
>
> Weird, this time oe-selftest was passing. Anything else I need to check locally to make sure it is working properly?
>
> 2025-11-19 12:25:28,520 - oe-selftest - INFO - test_custom_annotation_vars (spdx.SPDX30Check.test_custom_annotation_vars)
> 2025-11-19 12:26:22,548 - oe-selftest - INFO - Found ANNOTATION1: ANNOTATION1=TestAnnotation1
> 2025-11-19 12:26:22,548 - oe-selftest - INFO - Found ANNOTATION2: ANNOTATION2=TestAnnotation2
> 2025-11-19 12:26:22,549 - oe-selftest - INFO - ... ok
> 2025-11-19 12:26:27,823 - oe-selftest - INFO - ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 2025-11-19 12:26:27,823 - oe-selftest - INFO - Ran 1 test in 59.471s
> 2025-11-19 12:26:27,823 - oe-selftest - INFO - OK
> 2025-11-19 12:26:32,996 - oe-selftest - INFO - RESULTS:
> 2025-11-19 12:26:32,996 - oe-selftest - INFO - RESULTS - spdx.SPDX30Check.test_custom_annotation_vars: PASSED (54.03s)
> 2025-11-19 12:26:32,997 - oe-selftest - INFO - SUMMARY:
> 2025-11-19 12:26:32,997 - oe-selftest - INFO - oe-selftest () - Ran 1 test in 59.471s
> 2025-11-19 12:26:32,997 - oe-selftest - INFO - oe-selftest - OK - All required tests passed (successes=1, skipped=0, failures=0, errors=0)
>
> Best regards,
> Stefano
>
Hi Stefano,
I was able to reproduce this locally, using:
- oecore: https://git.yoctoproject.org/poky-ci-archive/tag/?h=oecore/autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/valkyrie/a-full-2740
- bitbake: https://git.yoctoproject.org/poky-ci-archive/tag/?h=bitbake/autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/valkyrie/a-full-2740
in local.conf:
MACHINE = "qemux86-64"
SANITY_TESTED_DISTROS = ""
An then:
oe-selftest -r spdx.SPDX30Check.test_custom_annotation_vars
Thanks,
Mathieu
--
Mathieu Dubois-Briand, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-19 15:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-17 13:04 [OE-core][PATCH v2] spdx30_tasks: Fix SPDX_CUSTOM_ANNOTATION_VARS implementation Stefano Tondo
2025-11-19 9:10 ` Mathieu Dubois-Briand
2025-11-19 12:33 ` Tondo, Stefano
2025-11-19 15:52 ` Mathieu Dubois-Briand [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DECSILYBSPUH.3Q482LTJ8SAD9@bootlin.com \
--to=mathieu.dubois-briand@bootlin.com \
--cc=Peter.Marko@siemens.com \
--cc=adrian.freihofer@siemens.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=stefano.tondo.ext@siemens.com \
--cc=stondo@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.