All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Kurt Borja" <kuurtb@gmail.com>
To: "Nuno Sá" <noname.nuno@gmail.com>,
	"Kurt Borja" <kuurtb@gmail.com>,
	"Andy Shevchenko" <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>,
	"Lars-Peter Clausen" <lars@metafoo.de>,
	"Michael Hennerich" <Michael.Hennerich@analog.com>,
	"Jonathan Cameron" <jic23@kernel.org>,
	"Benson Leung" <bleung@chromium.org>,
	"Antoniu Miclaus" <antoniu.miclaus@analog.com>,
	"Gwendal Grignou" <gwendal@chromium.org>,
	"Shrikant Raskar" <raskar.shree97@gmail.com>,
	"Per-Daniel Olsson" <perdaniel.olsson@axis.com>
Cc: "David Lechner" <dlechner@baylibre.com>,
	"Nuno Sá" <nuno.sa@analog.com>,
	"Andy Shevchenko" <andy@kernel.org>,
	"Guenter Roeck" <groeck@chromium.org>,
	"Jonathan Cameron" <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
	linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	chrome-platform@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/6] iio: core: Introduce cleanup.h support for mode locks
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2025 12:33:56 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <DEPM2M0JZVLR.D8R992OGRBMD@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <77ca77847511e67066a150096a7af2fb84f1f25f.camel@gmail.com>

On Thu Dec 4, 2025 at 9:36 AM -05, Nuno Sá wrote:
> On Wed, 2025-12-03 at 14:18 -0500, Kurt Borja wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> In a recent driver review discussion [1], Andy Shevchenko suggested we
>> add cleanup.h support for the lock API:
>> 
>> 	iio_device_claim_{direct,buffer_mode}().
>
> We already went this patch and then reverted it. I guess before we did not had
> ACQUIRE() and ACQUIRE_ERR() but I'm not sure that makes it much better. Looking at the
> last two patches on how we are handling the buffer mode stuff, I'm really not convinced...
>
> Also, I have doubts sparse can keep up with the __cleanup stuff so I'm not sure the
> annotations much make sense if we go down this path. Unless we want to use both 
> approaches which is also questionable.

I think if we add iio_device_claim() or whatever the final name may be,
we can annotate that instead with acquires(&mlock) and maybe it could
work?

I will test that.

>
> - Nuno Sá


-- 
 ~ Kurt


      parent reply	other threads:[~2025-12-04 17:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-12-03 19:18 [PATCH RFC 0/6] iio: core: Introduce cleanup.h support for mode locks Kurt Borja
2025-12-03 19:18 ` [PATCH RFC 1/6] iio: core: Match iio_device_claim_*() return semantics Kurt Borja
2025-12-04 14:23   ` Nuno Sá
2025-12-04 15:05     ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-12-06 18:07       ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-12-04 17:27     ` Kurt Borja
2025-12-06 18:05     ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-12-07 15:59       ` Kurt Borja
2025-12-03 19:18 ` [PATCH RFC 2/6] iio: core: Match iio_device_claim_*() naming Kurt Borja
2025-12-03 21:50   ` David Lechner
2025-12-04 17:35     ` Kurt Borja
2025-12-06 18:11       ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-12-03 19:18 ` [PATCH RFC 3/6] iio: core: Add cleanup.h support for iio_device_claim_*() Kurt Borja
2025-12-03 21:50   ` David Lechner
2025-12-03 22:34     ` David Lechner
2025-12-04 17:18       ` Kurt Borja
2025-12-04 17:36         ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-12-06 18:43           ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-12-06 20:40             ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-12-07 16:00             ` Kurt Borja
2025-12-06 18:20   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-12-07 15:59     ` Kurt Borja
2025-12-03 19:18 ` [PATCH RFC 4/6] iio: light: vcnl4000: Use cleanup.h for IIO locks Kurt Borja
2025-12-03 22:19   ` David Lechner
2025-12-03 19:18 ` [PATCH RFC 5/6] iio: health: max30102: " Kurt Borja
2025-12-03 21:52   ` David Lechner
2025-12-04 17:07     ` Kurt Borja
2025-12-04 17:35       ` David Lechner
2025-12-04 17:47         ` Kurt Borja
2025-12-06 18:17           ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-12-07 15:59             ` Kurt Borja
2025-12-03 19:18 ` [PATCH RFC 6/6] iio: light: opt4060: " Kurt Borja
2025-12-03 22:40   ` David Lechner
2025-12-04 17:23     ` Kurt Borja
2025-12-04 14:42   ` Nuno Sá
2025-12-04 17:31     ` Kurt Borja
2025-12-04 14:36 ` [PATCH RFC 0/6] iio: core: Introduce cleanup.h support for mode locks Nuno Sá
2025-12-04 15:07   ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-12-06 18:46     ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-12-07 16:00       ` Kurt Borja
2025-12-09 10:34       ` Nuno Sá
2025-12-09 17:05         ` David Lechner
2025-12-10  9:17           ` Nuno Sá
2025-12-10 18:04             ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-12-04 17:33   ` Kurt Borja [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=DEPM2M0JZVLR.D8R992OGRBMD@gmail.com \
    --to=kuurtb@gmail.com \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=Michael.Hennerich@analog.com \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@intel.com \
    --cc=andy@kernel.org \
    --cc=antoniu.miclaus@analog.com \
    --cc=bleung@chromium.org \
    --cc=chrome-platform@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
    --cc=groeck@chromium.org \
    --cc=gwendal@chromium.org \
    --cc=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=lars@metafoo.de \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=noname.nuno@gmail.com \
    --cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
    --cc=perdaniel.olsson@axis.com \
    --cc=raskar.shree97@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.