From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-ua1-f44.google.com (mail-ua1-f44.google.com [209.85.222.44]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB58B155326 for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2025 15:59:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.222.44 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1765123168; cv=none; b=KRJNg5WL/SWq/i9xUCzPBiM+CF+Xw8gVarK5K7M46iVMolk4yQphyOR4LBifFHI514kNIkCJ17z52bx2ozImRRt7YfEnx1f1HljwryeDFNTvj/G+DnUyzPkwY/4UFqImxQY2kphsl8C45aist55gweRUc+XWn0nSpw0X8fD5f6Y= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1765123168; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Ebs9xnJdozT9JhjRrPwwYTQ932pWegL9n1JhdAV3v+o=; h=Content-Type:Date:Message-Id:To:Cc:Subject:From:Mime-Version: References:In-Reply-To; b=B/Pg1GrikFB8S+67qbXFYrvF/nqQgA0CSZvVqHutlzFnkw6IQhErmut8i7Kb5l5sSPXj0rU+94Cy5w+aUjdqBKVnFQKQPByz6ioVJ4mv50A6lE372rHNrpa8Tl+v6o2li5EA0AKZ7vL5dAfBRRp/4KjFDq0A0V79ml0AQ51G7lo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=i54KdCCf; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.222.44 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="i54KdCCf" Received: by mail-ua1-f44.google.com with SMTP id a1e0cc1a2514c-9371f7571cfso1052156241.1 for ; Sun, 07 Dec 2025 07:59:26 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1765123166; x=1765727966; darn=lists.linux.dev; h=in-reply-to:references:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:from :subject:cc:to:message-id:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=lAgMFlNyMLRLjBCsqD3swe1jJ7Gk8kx8vIqYEMB0v5c=; b=i54KdCCfJIQm+V3dEoHGtlNMiGmulfPH4+2bIZuTA6E0UqN5ipCB61loKf9s1CdT7f J7kSJtBGaLXQQvt9LEKvO/xPSYysfjQBFnotlS05tEhfpuvrom+wVhudDiL3GZzxqrbQ sa0NtIVOyWly1OVLZEZTuqX2L1G4y48oLruPOTGwfkqKW97j2J0dNIOB1tZvj6IyuS3q DLhsa9NgL/cVSdFkXg34IlMK+5/o8Nca158orxJUIZGTOSP+hBR0Ah0lhs1D3wZSJCBR C0gtDBzNe53dfOBXzgdJzCJrxOjP8oGDzY7TfhIMhGTDcfzA/8QrnWLb57w1VfYsZOzV JEww== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1765123166; x=1765727966; h=in-reply-to:references:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:from :subject:cc:to:message-id:date:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=lAgMFlNyMLRLjBCsqD3swe1jJ7Gk8kx8vIqYEMB0v5c=; b=WWL7jUge6h0P40/4hMgIRj/ktgeiA+ReZmkUTrKnRmFQdXkT1Vxvusy2dNCqKSktHB Ayz0DsKbzt9d57UO8VPVK5i+cW3s70necwR12QyAtyQibLHlsWEqVChPQsGruoz8SKQ6 KCgO2tf0cIdFf115f6derBRnG+LwmNi1vRMzGmDFwcpwdO+0KiZ47aV4chVSanDIGaYA yU2IsChmcmIZEzM3w91YHB1gdwqmhqz4w8HDl6xHa0jT0V6ZG5jAd7BJc5vGZdrQ4XPK Kwcf/7Tt1cJ2IsVrf7D/ARQ15OYcXZ2MAF4JaLwG8mdj8NUglc9bXznGu71NtuKyCT1G 60wQ== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVECCnx0QHpyE/hzjkScm+rzIM4m6Sb7wrtEWeKBl0Qssxd9YGDU8O/myZikJsklOo653e3NfSH6ZIdmO9Vw0Y=@lists.linux.dev X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzyYTQC3af/6h8+Ifm55XY3JvTLocoGwxH6/QkYN5b1GcqprEBY eEDoWwmNUDq0BIknxWNm6jsLHJTVchRo6718gMjnkUbidD+itMq/p+cc X-Gm-Gg: ASbGnctugAURSOgg1ha81rMGEbbZKgX00YRQyfnoWYAbnA9Ionrc4VXue/NxH1daV+t UrGQLkO2mYrjFJ3yvosKbZImrGPPCA4w1pnAHApmlIQNm7TWtfWup1MtjKEFeg+ze11wcnQYl1H LJiiNhjoKVT5VBc0+muAdottqzNV1bq696T9nhfbrv7O2hzVKJatU5m3u4CsRTc4OcPWCHkmmQX R6IoSdUco20rvRctKEaRVLCzt93tfqfoAO0f6zaK8dJtdw+Ocg3VRRgba13yDy+Zj+aCnxlGlis SCwSRSa42PqZRBQnhYVuKqaXoQ3doDFvKMXxOcphBidSQFrudDL4QVsp41z9qbqBYteLtQ9Tp8D wvPkLJc3BzXoOpEER/Zqc7lKMX2xWiKVaQUgawUwwp0tVgbheT/AuWIwvSCknDsiAHwwEd4ZRLr jx2zI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFfxCyfUKoveUH7oGp1n4BsXKh+nrF3WusJSRi8+b035IQ1lyTlQABylKlq6X/maPcFuV+GdQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6102:1590:b0:5de:8e5:222d with SMTP id ada2fe7eead31-5e52cbda9admr1225249137.22.1765123165695; Sun, 07 Dec 2025 07:59:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([2800:bf0:82:3d2:875c:6c76:e06b:3095]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ada2fe7eead31-5e510cbb3dasm4480414137.9.2025.12.07.07.59.23 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 07 Dec 2025 07:59:25 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2025 10:59:22 -0500 Message-Id: To: "Jonathan Cameron" , =?utf-8?q?Nuno_S=C3=A1?= Cc: "Kurt Borja" , "Andy Shevchenko" , "Lars-Peter Clausen" , "Michael Hennerich" , "Benson Leung" , "Antoniu Miclaus" , "Gwendal Grignou" , "Shrikant Raskar" , "Per-Daniel Olsson" , "David Lechner" , =?utf-8?q?Nuno_S=C3=A1?= , "Andy Shevchenko" , "Guenter Roeck" , "Jonathan Cameron" , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/6] iio: core: Match iio_device_claim_*() return semantics From: "Kurt Borja" Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: chrome-platform@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: aerc 0.21.0-0-g5549850facc2 References: <20251203-lock-impr-v1-0-b4a1fd639423@gmail.com> <20251203-lock-impr-v1-1-b4a1fd639423@gmail.com> <9562673ef83dd73b6092b5a7d2042b380a55700c.camel@gmail.com> <20251206180546.2a8b8780@jic23-huawei> In-Reply-To: <20251206180546.2a8b8780@jic23-huawei> On Sat Dec 6, 2025 at 1:05 PM -05, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > On Thu, 04 Dec 2025 14:23:19 +0000 > Nuno S=C3=A1 wrote: > >> On Wed, 2025-12-03 at 14:18 -0500, Kurt Borja wrote: >> > In order to improve API consistency with conditional locks, use >> > true/false return semantics in iio_device_claim_buffer_mode(). >> >=20 >> > This also matches iio_device_claim_direct() return semantics. >> >=20 >> > Signed-off-by: Kurt Borja >> > --- =20 >>=20 >> Even if the rest gets a NACK, I think at least this patch makes sense. I= n fact I >> would even extend it so that we have the same inline API with proper ann= otations: >>=20 >> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.18/source/include/linux/iio/iio.h#L6= 79 >>=20 >> So it really has the same semantics as iio_device_claim_direct() > > Yeah. This was on my mental todo list. So great to see Kurt > dealing with it! :) These calls are much rarer than the direct ones > so I wasn't so fussed about getting the sparse coverage. Makes > sense to do it just wasn't high priority. > > As Nuno, suggested though I would like the sparse support for these. > > Jonathan Hi Jonathan, Great! I'll squash all "semantics" patches and add sparse support. --=20 ~ Kurt