Re: [PATCH] iio: adc: ti-ads1018: Drop iio_device_claim_buffer_mode() call

["Kurt Borja" <kuurtb@gmail.com>]

On Sun Dec 21, 2025 at 1:49 PM -05, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Dec 2025 19:52:01 -0500
> Kurt Borja <kuurtb@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Drop iio_device_claim_buffer_mode() call in ads1018_trigger_handler() as
>> it's not actually protecting anything.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Kurt Borja <kuurtb@gmail.com>
> I squashed this in.  One comment inline.
>> ---
>>  drivers/iio/adc/ti-ads1018.c | 12 +++---------
>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ti-ads1018.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ti-ads1018.c
>> index af08702b62d2..b34184f68e63 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ti-ads1018.c
>> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ti-ads1018.c
>> @@ -557,9 +557,6 @@ static irqreturn_t ads1018_trigger_handler(int irq, void *p)
>>  	} scan = {};
>>  	int ret;
>>  
>> -	if (iio_device_claim_buffer_mode(indio_dev))
>> -		goto out_notify_done;
>> -
>>  	if (iio_trigger_using_own(indio_dev)) {
>>  		disable_irq(ads1018->drdy_irq);
>>  		ret = ads1018_spi_read_exclusive(ads1018, &scan.conv, true);
>> @@ -568,14 +565,11 @@ static irqreturn_t ads1018_trigger_handler(int irq, void *p)
>>  		ret = spi_read(ads1018->spi, ads1018->rx_buf, sizeof(ads1018->rx_buf));
>>  		scan.conv = ads1018->rx_buf[0];
>>  	}
>> -	if (ret)
>> -		goto out_release_buffer;
>>  
>> -	iio_push_to_buffers_with_ts(indio_dev, &scan, sizeof(scan), pf->timestamp);
>> +	if (!ret)
> Generally I fairly strongly prefer error paths out of line but in this
> case I'd rather just get this merged than go around again so I'll leave
> this as it stands.

Apologies, I'll keep it in mind.

Thanks, Jonathan!

-- 
 ~ Kurt