From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5CD4C30FF23; Fri, 9 Jan 2026 14:48:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1767970107; cv=none; b=EqWq1O8sR7g6YI52NtSw9MDmh308Yp7fOB+3nX+ODmTVeBkW2s/HBoPcb2KKoSn+gxHFrmemaDTj64bi9J1qLKqDoWYkMrrE95i8Uo/Ds4zqnI9xkXNapg+adHGaG391cQUNGxiIPTELtsFoaTmgR3w2yoddkYBR+rw+u/0AXRA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1767970107; c=relaxed/simple; bh=UFN3laAEC/lQzR9niQO8cAwurAuz2ZqV01Yo/5Lyldg=; h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:Message-Id:From:To:Subject:Cc: References:In-Reply-To; b=fX9gw8PdkUMV2kPqQ4Eso2rid6Ug9Xe2m/GMyYkxfmtzswPI+FX7Slidmxhd0bZ7bojhsI6/D1SCQ3ebqw1j4a4BnZtP53VLMSCvA2NZUc/F0GP9BNG3KV1WIOpyXAOpEaKY2U3qnsVsIBHHw7/iWxrAWZTfA6ICBzqyLpslcjI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=vQDic7Cf; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="vQDic7Cf" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A2BDEC4CEF1; Fri, 9 Jan 2026 14:48:26 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1767970107; bh=UFN3laAEC/lQzR9niQO8cAwurAuz2ZqV01Yo/5Lyldg=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=vQDic7Cfe9lAnSRBc+67QceRUAWtYiRLr3bVoSj+Xl5b/mBmO1JUK+NwR0DUEbmEn Inj2lhRo9c0Axb0g9OqKDh36hXE/jrFx9IJY80wkMivsbJR4ASRks/2iJmr6XnIsDV qApHO4/XrVwfMNVLxotHFcInTsDXaBTOwfdgdZas2zB27ih3gj44Xv96pmc7I8UCDc cNyChtn+ZKBnKgbDC+kVImbNBKd1PS6Bnx8gIPl5xZX1GZV+lNoLwMHMwJ/E0ANtsB YWXm+7H9Gb5VZSyjgQRxyPS/b9sZ1FxQD4yKnMMznX1UKrXoL2MOMlqFk9VMAcc663 ofmejoCr5LUsQ== Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=1b802e9832ecc9650ec7774842aeacc48ff09eb0eba8bb8a1f0158f8ccc2; micalg=pgp-sha384; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2026 15:48:22 +0100 Message-Id: From: "Michael Walle" To: "Bartosz Golaszewski" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] gpio: davinci: implement .get_direction() Cc: "Bartosz Golaszewski" , "Keerthy" , "Linus Walleij" , , X-Mailer: aerc 0.20.0 References: <20260109130832.27326-1-bartosz.golaszewski@oss.qualcomm.com> In-Reply-To: --1b802e9832ecc9650ec7774842aeacc48ff09eb0eba8bb8a1f0158f8ccc2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 >> This will need a >> >> Fixes: a060b8c511ab ("gpiolib: implement low-level, shared GPIO support"= ) >> >> Otherwise the sa67 board will be broken with the defconfig (or any >> config enabled ARCH_QCOM). >> > > Can you confirm, you're still seeing the issue with: > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260108-gpio-shared-false-positive-v1-1-= 5dbf8d1b2f7d@oss.qualcomm.com/ Yes, latest next, with that patch applied, still causes the same issue. I don't think it's a false positive as the same gpio is used as enable for two different regulators :) -michael --1b802e9832ecc9650ec7774842aeacc48ff09eb0eba8bb8a1f0158f8ccc2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iKgEABMJADAWIQTIVZIcOo5wfU/AngkSJzzuPgIf+AUCaWEVNxIcbXdhbGxlQGtl cm5lbC5vcmcACgkQEic87j4CH/gENQGAmTNT/upw8XHmQLQ11Lz7gS0IovJuGl5l b1TOzb6WQeiVVdouv6k0CwA/DrJF6TLGAX40O69lAHEJn0dz3fclFVlgQLdXmV+6 be/I0jY4iA+vLQDNyVP3uy+VP2JlkeZqe5c= =Lvpc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --1b802e9832ecc9650ec7774842aeacc48ff09eb0eba8bb8a1f0158f8ccc2--