From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from phobos.denx.de (phobos.denx.de [85.214.62.61]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB1E1D715E5 for ; Sat, 24 Jan 2026 14:35:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from h2850616.stratoserver.net (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by phobos.denx.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00B9A83B32; Sat, 24 Jan 2026 15:35:23 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=disroot.org Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=u-boot-bounces@lists.denx.de Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; secure) header.d=disroot.org header.i=@disroot.org header.b="YCrwLuOy"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by phobos.denx.de (Postfix, from userid 109) id 8B42783BC4; Sat, 24 Jan 2026 08:14:25 +0100 (CET) Received: from layka.disroot.org (layka.disroot.org [178.21.23.139]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by phobos.denx.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 764E383B86 for ; Sat, 24 Jan 2026 08:14:23 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=disroot.org Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kauschluss@disroot.org Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by disroot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B58427C80; Sat, 24 Jan 2026 08:14:23 +0100 (CET) Received: from layka.disroot.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (disroot.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id qITgQLo925z2; Sat, 24 Jan 2026 08:14:22 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=disroot.org; s=mail; t=1769238862; bh=Wr7POptxM1aPxX6pVQFoXO4J3Y7afmCIeyggA95b4RU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=YCrwLuOyyGJD61fd8efah0ipKchyuJkuaAXMnwtPEgwRkuJGFdBaLH4jxTrznkIfO E4yefICrrCxHgDwtzOaPcZ7j0LrzY0HzbXuiPbU9aJxSqqZGTHl7lFgglRB0W/WkGM 12P0fCXKqgqVPf1SKSCklvo193i6pAePwmb4DN7CB028zOiODzVqtUUHYeiVUcIEJI PjQFCrs4C6mDnBBGIsuQfQuz3CI2i9dqJ9LCZYqDOXsW0hlfZamn+SMlIzP9nyQlP2 dONacyUWE8cP7cl15rAYI5VHecxaxzY0RyBf6NvvSBCzTKRVXpPiv6iT5TANM8e+XX 2izlX9XmnIdRA== Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2026 12:44:17 +0530 Message-Id: From: "Kaustabh Chakraborty" To: "Tom Rini" , "Kaustabh Chakraborty" Cc: Subject: Re: [PATCH] dts: add exynos arm64 vendor support for OF_UPSTREAM_BUILD_VENDOR References: <20260123-dts-exynos-vendor-v1-1-479e72170257@disroot.org> <20260123182003.GN3416603@bill-the-cat> In-Reply-To: <20260123182003.GN3416603@bill-the-cat> X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 24 Jan 2026 15:35:21 +0100 X-BeenThere: u-boot@lists.denx.de X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39 Precedence: list List-Id: U-Boot discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: u-boot-bounces@lists.denx.de Sender: "U-Boot" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.103.8 at phobos.denx.de X-Virus-Status: Clean On 2026-01-23 12:20 -06:00, Tom Rini wrote: > On Fri, Jan 23, 2026 at 11:41:41PM +0530, Kaustabh Chakraborty wrote: > >> Set OF_UPSTREAM_BUILD_VENDOR to build all devicetrees in "exynos/" for >> Exynos-based 64-bit ARM platforms (32-bit ARM uses "samsung/"). >>=20 >> Signed-off-by: Kaustabh Chakraborty >> --- >> dts/Kconfig | 1 + >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >>=20 >> diff --git a/dts/Kconfig b/dts/Kconfig >> index 870f75ad3ec..e0f6f03a343 100644 >> --- a/dts/Kconfig >> +++ b/dts/Kconfig >> @@ -124,6 +124,7 @@ config OF_UPSTREAM_VENDOR >> default "marvell" if ARCH_MVEBU || ARCH_KIRKWOOD >> default "xilinx" if ARCH_VERSAL || ARCH_ZYNQ >> default "nvidia" if ARCH_TEGRA >> + default "exynos" if ARCH_EXYNOS && ARCH_ARM64 >> help >> Select the vendor to build all devicetree files for. > > Two things. First, it's "ARM64" and not "ARCH_ARM64". Second, since we > know what the 32bit one is and it's not the same, we might as well do > both while we're here? Sure, I can add it. However "samsung/" in ARM also includes pre-Exynos SoCs, I assume that's not a problem here.