From: "Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@kernel.org>
To: "Alexandre Courbot" <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Cc: "Gary Guo" <gary@garyguo.net>,
"Alice Ryhl" <aliceryhl@google.com>,
"David Airlie" <airlied@gmail.com>,
"Simona Vetter" <simona@ffwll.ch>,
"Alistair Popple" <apopple@nvidia.com>,
"John Hubbard" <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
"Joel Fernandes" <joelagnelf@nvidia.com>,
"Timur Tabi" <ttabi@nvidia.com>, "Zhi Wang" <zhiw@nvidia.com>,
"Eliot Courtney" <ecourtney@nvidia.com>,
<rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org>,
<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] gpu: nova-core: gsp: fix undefined behavior in command queue code
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2026 15:45:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DHB3DKHRDIZS.WXMYD9ISB0QU@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DHB3CGY1Z5HF.1KSJV8SP8YD8A@nvidia.com>
On Tue Mar 24, 2026 at 3:44 PM CET, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> Should we apply or drop this patch meanwhile? I/O projections are still
> undergoing review, but I'm fine with dropping it if Danilo thinks we can
> live a bit longer with that UB. It's not like the driver is actively
> doing anything useful yet anyway.
We should pick this up regardless, I/O projections won't we usable for drm-rust
this cycle.
Thanks,
Danilo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-24 14:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-23 5:40 [PATCH v2] gpu: nova-core: gsp: fix undefined behavior in command queue code Alexandre Courbot
2026-03-23 16:44 ` Gary Guo
2026-03-24 14:44 ` Alexandre Courbot
2026-03-24 14:45 ` Danilo Krummrich [this message]
2026-03-24 15:15 ` Gary Guo
2026-03-26 4:30 ` Alexandre Courbot
2026-03-26 4:51 ` Alexandre Courbot
2026-03-26 12:03 ` Gary Guo
2026-03-26 15:55 ` Alice Ryhl
2026-03-27 0:47 ` Alexandre Courbot
2026-03-28 13:09 ` Gary Guo
2026-03-28 14:53 ` Alexandre Courbot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DHB3DKHRDIZS.WXMYD9ISB0QU@kernel.org \
--to=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=acourbot@nvidia.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=aliceryhl@google.com \
--cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=ecourtney@nvidia.com \
--cc=gary@garyguo.net \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=joelagnelf@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
--cc=ttabi@nvidia.com \
--cc=zhiw@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.