All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Luka Gejak" <luka.gejak@linux.dev>
To: "Mashiro Chen" <mashiro.chen@mailbox.org>
Cc: "Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Dan Carpenter" <error27@gmail.com>,
	<linux-staging@lists.linux.dev>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] staging: rtl8723bs: macro fixes in basic_types.h
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2026 14:36:03 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <DHG6XM1H014T.B4RW4LAW5XXU@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260330114232.91431-1-mashiro.chen@mailbox.org>

Hi Mashiro,
Thanks for the v2. This series is a solid improvement. Cleaning up the
basic_types.h header is a necessary step toward eventually getting 
qqthis driver out of staging and into the mainline networking tree.
Here is my formal review of the series.

Patch 1/3: Excellent catch by Dan Carpenter here. Removing the 
WRITEEF/READEF macros is far superior to fixing them. Specifically, 
the latent bug in WRITEEF4BYTE (which incorrectly used EF2BYTE) is now
gone without adding any binary bloat.

Patch 2/3: This correctly silences the COMPLEX_MACRO warnings from 
checkpatch.pl. While these macros are candidates for a full refactor 
into <linux/bitfield.h> eventually, your fix ensures operator 
precedence is respected in the meantime.

Patch 3/3: Clean and trivial.

So for the series:
Reviewed-by: Luka Gejak <luka.gejak@linux.dev>

Best regards,
Luka Gejak

      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-03-30 14:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-30 11:42 [PATCH v2 0/3] staging: rtl8723bs: macro fixes in basic_types.h Mashiro Chen
2026-03-30 11:42 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] staging: rtl8723bs: remove unused WRITEEF/READEF byte macros Mashiro Chen
2026-03-30 11:42 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] staging: rtl8723bs: wrap complex macros with parentheses Mashiro Chen
2026-03-30 11:42 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] staging: rtl8723bs: remove redundant blank lines in basic_types.h Mashiro Chen
2026-03-30 14:36 ` Luka Gejak [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=DHG6XM1H014T.B4RW4LAW5XXU@linux.dev \
    --to=luka.gejak@linux.dev \
    --cc=error27@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=mashiro.chen@mailbox.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.