From: "Ludovic MARCILLY" <lmarcilly@aressi.fr>
To: linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re-4: Authentication problems
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 12:21:58 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DIIE.000007710001E2CB@aressi.fr> (raw)
Ok. So if i want my client to authenticate with CHAP, i have to put these options in my config file on the client side:
refuse-pap
refuse-eap
refuse-mschap
refuse-mschap-v2
Am i right? I will test it now in order to be sure.
And if i just configure authentication on the server? For example, no require-[pap|chap|eap|mschap|mschap-v2] and no refuse-[pap|chap|eap|mschap|mschap-v2] in the config file on the client side but just enable chap on the server side. Will it work?
Thanks a lot for your help. I have difficulties to understand the require and refuse options.
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: Re-2: Authentication problems (12-sept.-2006 13:21)
From: James Carlson <carlsonj@workingcode.com>
To: lmarcilly@aressi.fr
> Gilles Espinasse writes:
> > > So i can't put these options in the config file on the client side? If i
> > > understand, he server ask the client for PAP, CHAP or MS-CHAP method to
> > > authenticate? The client doesn't choose authentication method? Is it right?
> > >
> > If one authentication is not configured on the client side, pppd will
> > answer
> > with a nak on the request and could offer another authentication method if
> > available (that the server may or not accept).
>
> "Configured" in this case means that pppd has access to credentials --
> a user name and pass phrase or shared secret for a given
> authentication protocol -- and that it's not told _not_ to use them.
>
> On the authenticatee ("client") side, all that you can do is agree to
> the peer's request or suggest an alternative; you can't demand to be
> identified with a given protocol.
>
> Authentication must work that way. Allowing the authenticatee to
> specify the means of validation is insecure.
>
> On the other side, if you're setting up a "server," you use the
> 'require-pap' keyword (note that "+pap" is obsolescent) to say that
> the peers must use PAP to identify themselves.
>
> --
> James Carlson 42.703N 71.076W <carlsonj@workingcode.com>
To: carlsonj@workingcode.com
g.esp@free.fr
Cc: linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org
next reply other threads:[~2006-09-12 12:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-09-12 12:21 Ludovic MARCILLY [this message]
2006-09-12 12:27 ` Re-4: Authentication problems James Carlson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DIIE.000007710001E2CB@aressi.fr \
--to=lmarcilly@aressi.fr \
--cc=linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.