From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtpout-03.galae.net (smtpout-03.galae.net [185.246.85.4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95D12233933 for ; Wed, 20 May 2026 17:48:41 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.246.85.4 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779299325; cv=none; b=CWuChUl5kjNfwl1rDRzE3rZEQLxOaENvvOU9NxdEeocFVRkkASPq+AajiJuo0VjOdBKCsXv8r44eWisN9ufQhnX+NMKcI7OHTniRVZ6XGV+DaelNvlU6GhKRNP90NgeMHPQwd6rvfTFsvW5PeTTKHO8iRCEn5XyynTNhTaI1++c= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779299325; c=relaxed/simple; bh=tD1a/JPJxpioI0aTNTe7Mcgt0N1AuDGP+Nnn6f05D7E=; h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:Message-Id:Cc:To:From:Subject: References:In-Reply-To; b=N5kDskNKamEo8kUbvl6NAQetfKORnAaowUqIedSc4LEPEUpQ/p8VQFLDR5CWOH0ZsqT3/o+pyvQX3HCC6qoc/C2i0Sy474hyfyRadI0v+9NR4DK2AR2ws6kaH8Hyw5XV5jcXi5bpW4GjWtJJWDVygnht6GN/HqjOYqAJ6UyN+tY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b=ULpO1BRs; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.246.85.4 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b="ULpO1BRs" Received: from smtpout-01.galae.net (smtpout-01.galae.net [212.83.139.233]) by smtpout-03.galae.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E6D94E42D06; Wed, 20 May 2026 17:48:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.galae.net (mail.galae.net [212.83.136.155]) by smtpout-01.galae.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D48B360019; Wed, 20 May 2026 17:48:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Mailerdaemon) with ESMTPSA id 67AA9107EA37F; Wed, 20 May 2026 19:48:33 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=dkim; t=1779299318; h=from:subject:date:message-id:to:cc:mime-version:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:references; bh=tD1a/JPJxpioI0aTNTe7Mcgt0N1AuDGP+Nnn6f05D7E=; b=ULpO1BRsFYLQ/Usb++wi84bJIOQmzLZjh2Fxdpz18iQbig80PcW4BowWBurNRmA8Wzzp4A IiqUZUwfQWfaqAoaMEAWo2nDoZ766boo3rezihWzLZb/hqK1V3yiRhSwnTFpfpJdNqnoAN unZCxUmd+jJwJfBR+GOjP1l/8NdW8TgM4T7jzVQLMN3XZC4z0j+buDFdgNpauyHrmoXyy/ iucwUBW73KEgwBUJoQe6iFP+XHqaoOTBqMtZBPa+bJExeXh3MG7g0OKchVjdkx0+0PDKA4 xGRmaFebPe1uV9lucSKKCjnt7Vul0+9+dKMHRxswxz4wQso4mwvR45blNur53A== Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Wed, 20 May 2026 19:48:31 +0200 Message-Id: Cc: , , , , , , , , , , , , , To: , , , From: "Luca Ceresoli" Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] drm: bridge: ti-sn65dsi83: Fix DSI mode flags for stable LVDS output X-Mailer: aerc 0.20.1 References: <20260412053811.662461-1-tessolveupstream@gmail.com> <20260412053811.662461-2-tessolveupstream@gmail.com> <7056b23b-ed81-4d79-b782-5cfcb0102ef7@gmail.com> <60a24977-b181-40e4-bcf6-38b65af293e2@gmail.com> <1716be56-ac43-440b-a5df-58cbf571ba95@gmail.com> <8a78aab6-918a-4bed-a913-05ecb559da4f@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <8a78aab6-918a-4bed-a913-05ecb559da4f@gmail.com> X-Last-TLS-Session-Version: TLSv1.3 On Wed May 20, 2026 at 2:29 PM CEST, tessolveupstream wrote: >>> Additionally, regarding the Tested-by tags you mentioned earlier, >>> should I carry them forward to both patches, or would you prefer them >>> only on the applicable patch? >> >> I'd say yes. People who sent these tags have tested a patch that is the = sum >> of the two future patches, so I'd say it's OK to keep the R-by on both >> patches. >> > > Okay, I just wanted to confirm one point =E2=80=94 when you mentioned R-b= y, are you > referring to the Reviewed-by tag? I wanted to make sure I understood it > correctly before carrying the tags forward in the next version. =F0=9F=99= =82> Thanks for your patience. We'll get to the bottom of this issue! :) Oops, I wrote R-by but I meant Tested-by. I don't think you received any other (Acked/Reviewed-by) tags. Luca -- Luca Ceresoli, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com