From: "Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@kernel.org>
To: "Onur Özkan" <work@onurozkan.dev>
Cc: <rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<ojeda@kernel.org>, <boqun@kernel.org>, <gary@garyguo.net>,
<bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com>, <lossin@kernel.org>,
<a.hindborg@kernel.org>, <aliceryhl@google.com>,
<tmgross@umich.edu>, <peterz@infradead.org>,
<fujita.tomonori@gmail.com>, <tamird@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] rust: workqueue: add cancel_sync support
Date: Fri, 22 May 2026 15:15:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DIP8F1CLYQ27.11XC6BW3Y3WGP@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260510082211.207450-1-work@onurozkan.dev>
On Sun May 10, 2026 at 10:21 AM CEST, Onur Özkan wrote:
> Drivers can use this during teardown to cancel pending work and wait for
> running work to finish before dropping related resources.
If you need this for driver teardown and the work uses device resources, you
should rather create a new type of work that internally synchronizes with driver
unbind.
This also allows you to provide a &Device<Bound> within the work function itself
directly.
Instead you now have to fall back to unsafe code in your work callback
implementation making it a driver responsibility to call cancel_sync() at the
correct point of time:
// SAFETY: `Controller` is part of driver-private data and only exists
// while the platform device is bound.
let pdev = unsafe { self.pdev.as_ref().as_bound() };
I already mentioned this a couple of times in the past that we want "managed"
work for drivers for this exact reason.
More in general, please don't use Device::as_bound() from driver code; if it is
needed it implies a design issue or that we're missing a proper solution.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-22 13:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-10 8:21 [PATCH v1] rust: workqueue: add cancel_sync support Onur Özkan
2026-05-10 13:43 ` Alice Ryhl
2026-05-10 15:53 ` Onur Özkan
2026-05-13 7:33 ` Alice Ryhl
2026-05-22 11:39 ` Onur Özkan
2026-05-22 13:15 ` Danilo Krummrich [this message]
2026-05-23 6:52 ` Onur Özkan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DIP8F1CLYQ27.11XC6BW3Y3WGP@kernel.org \
--to=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=a.hindborg@kernel.org \
--cc=aliceryhl@google.com \
--cc=bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com \
--cc=boqun@kernel.org \
--cc=fujita.tomonori@gmail.com \
--cc=gary@garyguo.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lossin@kernel.org \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tamird@kernel.org \
--cc=tmgross@umich.edu \
--cc=work@onurozkan.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.