From: "Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@kernel.org>
To: "Runyu Xiao" <runyu.xiao@seu.edu.cn>
Cc: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, <rafael@kernel.org>,
<cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>, <tom.leiming@gmail.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
<jianhao.xu@seu.edu.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] driver core: enforce device_lock for driver_match_device()
Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2026 18:44:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DIYPR0K2CZW7.254R8K7ONBX5D@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260602160829.560904-1-runyu.xiao@seu.edu.cn>
On Tue Jun 2, 2026 at 6:08 PM CEST, Runyu Xiao wrote:
> This issue was first flagged by our static analysis tool while auditing
> driver_override match paths, then manually confirmed on Linux v6.18.21.
> We reproduced the race with no-device KCSAN/MSV harnesses across AMBA,
> WMI, RPMSG, VMBUS, VDPA, CDX, CSS, FSL-MC, and PCI. Those reports all
> reduce to the same core-side gap in driver_match_device().
This is all fixed in driver-core-next already, please also see [1] and [2].
> Fix this by introducing driver_match_device_locked(), which guarantees
> holding device_lock(dev) with a scoped guard before entering the bus
> match callback. Convert the two unlocked call sites to this helper, and
> add a device_lock_assert() to driver_match_device() so the contract is
> explicit.
This approach was reverted [3] for the reasons documented in the linked patch.
Thanks,
Danilo
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/driver-core/20260303115720.48783-1-dakr@kernel.org/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/driver-core/20260324005919.2408620-1-dakr@kernel.org/
[3] https://lore.kernel.org/driver-core/20260302002545.19389-1-dakr@kernel.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-02 16:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-02 16:08 [PATCH] driver core: enforce device_lock for driver_match_device() Runyu Xiao
2026-06-02 16:39 ` Greg KH
2026-06-02 16:44 ` Danilo Krummrich [this message]
2026-06-03 3:36 ` Runyu Xiao
2026-06-04 3:52 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] Convert remaining buses to generic driver_override handling Runyu Xiao
2026-06-04 3:52 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] amba: use generic driver_override infrastructure Runyu Xiao
2026-06-04 3:52 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] rpmsg: core: " Runyu Xiao
2026-06-08 17:47 ` Mathieu Poirier
2026-06-04 3:52 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] vmbus: " Runyu Xiao
2026-06-04 4:13 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-04 3:52 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] cdx: " Runyu Xiao
2026-06-04 4:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-08 18:09 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] Convert remaining buses to generic driver_override handling Danilo Krummrich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DIYPR0K2CZW7.254R8K7ONBX5D@kernel.org \
--to=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jianhao.xu@seu.edu.cn \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=runyu.xiao@seu.edu.cn \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tom.leiming@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.