From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81C6BCD8CB9 for ; Wed, 10 Jun 2026 12:54:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtpout-04.galae.net (smtpout-04.galae.net [185.171.202.116]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.msgproc02-g2.19784.1781096054498168953 for ; Wed, 10 Jun 2026 05:54:14 -0700 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=pass header.i=@bootlin.com header.s=dkim header.b=SrX0xjK+; spf=pass (domain: bootlin.com, ip: 185.171.202.116, mailfrom: antonin.godard@bootlin.com) Received: from smtpout-01.galae.net (smtpout-01.galae.net [212.83.139.233]) by smtpout-04.galae.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39F83C49F58 for ; Wed, 10 Jun 2026 12:54:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.galae.net (mail.galae.net [212.83.136.155]) by smtpout-01.galae.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 504E25FFC9; Wed, 10 Jun 2026 12:54:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Mailerdaemon) with ESMTPSA id B3BAF106B90C5; Wed, 10 Jun 2026 14:54:11 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=dkim; t=1781096052; h=from:subject:date:message-id:to:mime-version:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:references; bh=t0ExjBHWf21hFryqCy6lPwlygtElY3Ea7ywWBTwR7eo=; b=SrX0xjK+rGOWysFR38Bzm9HzZlDi1YcEBXv7D5cZhWmODF1JVcwDheZSCkqFSHRdNHoA0A 0tctGsN1K6LKuZUXRxfoVS6fAxvrxA79AQKa2kmL8E5Wdt0VPXiQ36Kq48RAK2wFeJlsKY /sbb72Tg4NJpvznSUsYutirDeZk5uFgYv5sAi5Ha/tfsvmq/JKLsOTJ1uM64v7bThmUg4u jNxHisXqavaWMWvyp/0aUwXy0MyIOjqLxTQZ0XQoE2QJprb3mzBOnUXm6oFfN3pbxFd3Az DIHSsiLU1+jtX0gERw9D39FAd/WQ/kHQz8xmZiZwtArMZRO78mvZGvupSZe59g== Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2026 14:54:11 +0200 Message-Id: Subject: Re: [docs] would anyone object to my updating "Adding a New Machine"? From: "Antonin Godard" To: "Robert P. J. Day" , "YP docs mailing list" References: In-Reply-To: X-Last-TLS-Session-Version: TLSv1.3 List-Id: X-Webhook-Received: from 45-33-107-173.ip.linodeusercontent.com [45.33.107.173] by aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org with HTTPS for ; Wed, 10 Jun 2026 12:54:16 -0000 X-Groupsio-URL: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/docs/message/9680 Hi, On Tue Jun 9, 2026 at 7:19 PM CEST, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > this section: > > https://docs.yoctoproject.org/dev-manual/new-machine.html > > is pretty out of date, using the "crownbay" as an example. any > interest in me updating it to refer to something current, perhaps > something rockchip like the orangepi-5-plus, which would show how a > top-level machine definition file recursively includes more and more > low-level files to fully define a machine? I don't see how it is out-of-date, the important variables to set are still valid. > or is there some other modern machine definition that would be > a better example? or is it not worth the trouble? This document does not seem to make use of an existing machine at the momen= t, and points to meta-yocto to find examples. I think it's fine as it is, unle= ss you think of other variables that should be part of the important ones. Antonin