From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7976FCD98F2 for ; Fri, 19 Jun 2026 09:53:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 149A610E095; Fri, 19 Jun 2026 09:53:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: gabe.freedesktop.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b="1+wijf1k"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from smtpout-04.galae.net (smtpout-04.galae.net [185.171.202.116]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B160C10E062 for ; Fri, 19 Jun 2026 09:53:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtpout-01.galae.net (smtpout-01.galae.net [212.83.139.233]) by smtpout-04.galae.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8BACEC06CD8; Fri, 19 Jun 2026 09:53:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.galae.net (mail.galae.net [212.83.136.155]) by smtpout-01.galae.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0DEA601AD; Fri, 19 Jun 2026 09:53:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Mailerdaemon) with ESMTPSA id AE210106C893D; Fri, 19 Jun 2026 11:53:25 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=dkim; t=1781862811; h=from:subject:date:message-id:to:cc:mime-version:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:references; bh=73m8X7tBYSSumVWkvx9MDN1jdOTQZt/hH/3vwN+HHRw=; b=1+wijf1kiX2kgBi40K4x+/I769WQqqYBtdDTJX6kTFve8e8nZurxu3lBXqxBvRZtOX6hJB svT/D8cf6+H7lLm7YwwUUdy0fPupG3XEa2txFpgUBaaMrWlufSA90JnO+wORouEDtL1CBJ zq2x/pBq99XqDhugR/Jg2pfd+fV6lw3eDZ2PBqXtvyMzWcKzPzRiT1PqYj8bn6FzoZlVpJ VJGMbTC5zM8uluOPAqCKIcGrpFKanJC3FdKvUBUhXs+IZ10yYY+Vr9s3dysayL3vn+QOH9 RDElkcjVagilYFVm2UD2BmPoIC7Yhjwec874oBczDdXhj7F2CvxLwgUeA3G9lA== Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2026 11:53:24 +0200 Message-Id: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/78] drm/atomic-state-helper: Add drm_atomic_helper_bridge_create_state() Cc: "Andrzej Hajda" , "Neil Armstrong" , "Robert Foss" , "Laurent Pinchart" , "Jonas Karlman" , "Jernej Skrabec" , "Maarten Lankhorst" , "Thomas Zimmermann" , "David Airlie" , "Simona Vetter" , "Dmitry Baryshkov" , , "Laurent Pinchart" To: "Maxime Ripard" , "Luca Ceresoli" From: "Luca Ceresoli" X-Mailer: aerc 0.21.0 References: <20260608-drm-no-more-bridge-reset-v2-0-0a91018bf886@kernel.org> <20260608-drm-no-more-bridge-reset-v2-7-0a91018bf886@kernel.org> <178171213665.312625.18415471327369488806.b4-review@b4> <20260619-provocative-mindful-boobook-d7d2c8@houat> In-Reply-To: <20260619-provocative-mindful-boobook-d7d2c8@houat> X-Last-TLS-Session-Version: TLSv1.3 X-BeenThere: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Direct Rendering Infrastructure - Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "dri-devel" Hi Maxime, On Fri Jun 19, 2026 at 10:02 AM CEST, Maxime Ripard wrote: > On Wed, Jun 17, 2026 at 06:02:16PM +0200, Luca Ceresoli wrote: >> On Mon, 08 Jun 2026 16:35:49 +0200, Maxime Ripard w= rote: >> > The drm_atomic_helper_bridge_reset() helper is deprecated in favour >> > of the new atomic_create_state callback. >> >> I understand this series is eventually removing it, but it does not seem= to >> deprecated (in the kdoc at least). So maybe the commit message should eb >> reworded as "The drm_atomic_helper_bridge_reset() helper is about to be >> removed..."? > > Sorry, I meant to reply but forgot. I guess it really depends on what > you call "deprecated", but it's very much something we want to move away > from when creating a new state only. It might not have been as clearly > documented as one would have hoped, but I don't think it's worth > documenting something we'll remove in this series, or change the commit > message. Thanks for the feedback. I guess this is not the easiest series to rebase, so I'd say it's fine as you are removing at the end of the series. Luca -- Luca Ceresoli, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com