From: "Alexis Lothoré" <alexis.lothore@bootlin.com>
To: "Ricardo B. Marlière" <rbm@suse.com>,
"Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@kernel.org>,
"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
"Andrii Nakryiko" <andrii@kernel.org>,
"Eduard Zingerman" <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
"Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi" <memxor@gmail.com>,
"Martin KaFai Lau" <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
"Song Liu" <song@kernel.org>,
"Yonghong Song" <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
"Jiri Olsa" <jolsa@kernel.org>,
"Emil Tsalapatis" <emil@etsalapatis.com>,
"Shuah Khan" <shuah@kernel.org>,
"Alexis Lothoré (eBPF Foundation)" <alexis.lothore@bootlin.com>,
"Ihor Solodrai" <ihor.solodrai@linux.dev>,
"Christian Brauner" <brauner@kernel.org>
Cc: <bpf@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] selftests/bpf: Install bpftool where test_progs expects to find it
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2026 17:32:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DJXJWE3X286K.16LM4LUS201ZP@bootlin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260710-selftests-bpf_fixes-v1-1-aa24dfd6f4f9@suse.com>
Hi,
On Sat Jul 11, 2026 at 12:09 AM CEST, Ricardo B. Marlière wrote:
> bpftool_helpers.c looks for bpftool at "tools/sbin/bpftool" or
> "../tools/sbin/bpftool" relative to the running test_progs binary, matching
> the build directory layout where bpftool sits at
> $(OUTPUT)/tools/sbin/bpftool.
>
> INSTALL_RULE installs bpftool through the generic TEST_GEN_PROGS_EXTENDED
> mechanism, which flattens it straight into $(INSTALL_PATH) and loses the
> tools/sbin/ prefix. After "make install", every flavor of test_progs,
> including the default one, fails to locate bpftool, and bpftool_maps_access
> and bpftool_metadata error out with "Failed to detect bpftool path", even
> though bpftool itself built and installed fine.
>
> Explicitly install bpftool under tools/sbin/ in the installed tree
> so its relative location matches what detect_bpftool_path() already
> expects, restoring the pre-install layout instead of introducing a
> new one.
>
> Fixes: f21fae577446 ("selftests/bpf: Add a few helpers for bpftool testing")
> Signed-off-by: Ricardo B. Marlière <rbm@suse.com>
I did not face the issue because I am running the selftests in-tree, and
the CI seems to do the same, but for users using selftests after running
`make install`, I guess the change makes sense.
That's not the first fix aiming to improve bpftool
detection/installation (eg the BPFTOOL env variable, see [1]), so it
makes me wonder if we shouldn't just make bpftool part of
TRUNNER_EXTRA_FILES for all flavours of test_progs, similarly to other
binaries needed during tests (eg: urandom_read), instead of just adding
some bpftool-specific details in this generic install rule, and just
make the test runners assume that the needed binary is in the same
directory.
Alexis
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260223191118.655185-2-ihor.solodrai@linux.dev/
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
> index b642ee489ea6..47911c9b4977 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
> @@ -1055,6 +1055,8 @@ endif
> DEFAULT_INSTALL_RULE := $(INSTALL_RULE)
> override define INSTALL_RULE
> $(DEFAULT_INSTALL_RULE)
> + @mkdir -p $(INSTALL_PATH)/tools/sbin
> + @rsync -a $(if $(PERMISSIVE),--ignore-missing-args) $(TRUNNER_BPFTOOL) $(INSTALL_PATH)/tools/sbin/
> @for DIR in $(TEST_INST_SUBDIRS); do \
> mkdir -p $(INSTALL_PATH)/$$DIR; \
> rsync -a $(if $(PERMISSIVE),--ignore-missing-args) \
--
Alexis Lothoré, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-13 15:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-10 22:09 [PATCH 0/4] selftests/bpf: A few edge case fixes Ricardo B. Marlière
2026-07-10 22:09 ` [PATCH 1/4] selftests/bpf: Install bpftool where test_progs expects to find it Ricardo B. Marlière
2026-07-13 15:32 ` Alexis Lothoré [this message]
2026-07-10 22:09 ` [PATCH 2/4] selftests/bpf: Install resolve_btfids.test.o.BTF where the test expects it Ricardo B. Marlière
2026-07-10 22:09 ` [PATCH 3/4] selftests/bpf: Fix lsm_bdev dev_t encoding mismatch Ricardo B. Marlière
2026-07-10 22:09 ` [PATCH 4/4] libbpf: Search /lib64 and /lib in resolve_full_path() Ricardo B. Marlière
2026-07-10 22:58 ` bot+bpf-ci
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DJXJWE3X286K.16LM4LUS201ZP@bootlin.com \
--to=alexis.lothore@bootlin.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
--cc=ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=rbm@suse.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.