All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@kernel.org>
To: "Corentin Labbe" <clabbe@baylibre.com>
Cc: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
	<rafael@kernel.org>, <russ.weight@linux.dev>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <driver-core@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firmware: maintain a firmware list
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2026 19:23:25 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <DJZBI1NIB539.2WG8TLYV4ZXDV@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260715131325.26099-1-clabbe@baylibre.com>

(Cc: driver-core; please make sure to Cc all relevant mailing lists)

On Wed Jul 15, 2026 at 3:13 PM CEST, Corentin Labbe wrote:
> From: Corentin LABBE <clabbe@baylibre.com>
>
> Checking if some firmware is missing need to check dmesg for error message,
> and on some machine this information could be lost since dmesg uses a ring buffer.
> Having the list of all firmware requests is useful in many situations,
> like selecting the minimal list when doing some buildroot config
> or reducing the size of linux-firmware on gentoo via saveconfig.

The proposed implementation aside, I don't see why this needs a new kernel
interface.

  - Why can't you use 'modinfo -F firmware' for all compiled modules?

  - Don't you have a journal persisting the dmesg logs?

  - Why can't you use kprobe_event on the kernel command line if you really need
    a runtime trace?

Untested, but something like

	kprobe_event=p:fw_req,_request_firmware,name=+0(%si):string

should work I think.

Thanks,
Danilo

  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-15 17:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-15 13:13 [PATCH] firmware: maintain a firmware list Corentin Labbe
2026-07-15 17:23 ` Danilo Krummrich [this message]
2026-07-16  9:29   ` Corentin LABBE
2026-07-16 20:12     ` Danilo Krummrich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=DJZBI1NIB539.2WG8TLYV4ZXDV@kernel.org \
    --to=dakr@kernel.org \
    --cc=clabbe@baylibre.com \
    --cc=driver-core@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=russ.weight@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.