From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB493C44511 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2026 16:57:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtpout-04.galae.net (smtpout-04.galae.net [185.171.202.116]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.msgproc01-g2.17850.1784221067067586015 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2026 09:57:48 -0700 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=pass header.i=@bootlin.com header.s=dkim header.b=yTesftfO; spf=pass (domain: bootlin.com, ip: 185.171.202.116, mailfrom: mathieu.dubois-briand@bootlin.com) Received: from smtpout-01.galae.net (smtpout-01.galae.net [212.83.139.233]) by smtpout-04.galae.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 250B4C2B9D6; Thu, 16 Jul 2026 16:58:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.galae.net (mail.galae.net [212.83.136.155]) by smtpout-01.galae.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 876A76035F; Thu, 16 Jul 2026 16:57:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Mailerdaemon) with ESMTPSA id 9827811BD3D27; Thu, 16 Jul 2026 18:57:41 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=dkim; t=1784221063; h=from:subject:date:message-id:to:cc:mime-version:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:references; bh=z6UpM+mttWFJcPnlOVy9/0qnvfwK4LcXKQGjDGF/an0=; b=yTesftfOxOPQkqT+b+Wll139ve+j92SgVeI2A22ZhBm2ZpF/PJvuKPgcT76bCOgB40sKYs BMsXbVZCLIqda9/mdtr+DPWU80lMEBxnCkAsuWBVjb1LhjBvDOdSN2uDZXe0J9EVeELEVa iBuG+EUio2ufzY54OODdM9BADvKl+EZKYl2Lsqq5NVHJS9As6HyLz2e4BHrEdx00wUrRcK Y6ZUp1+TWQ/kRh2r03GG7mmP9pPLXbY+5JpGI1ZwUAUOTS8hcoVSJ5cv/sZwHlJ+BA20Lb CDPNNw1DG/cc+9gyAHbPqXq9unqJdM5uYU6HmtnE1WhmFzO3NloMP1SdBzoMjA== Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2026 18:57:40 +0200 Message-Id: From: "Mathieu Dubois-Briand" To: "Deepesh Varatharajan" , Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/3 v6] Oe-selftest for Clang, LLVM, LLD Cc: X-Mailer: aerc 0.21.0-0-g5549850facc2 References: <20260715060021.579656-1-Deepesh.Varatharajan@windriver.com> <95e58c26-7eea-4f68-8bb6-fbd3b85041e3@windriver.com> In-Reply-To: <95e58c26-7eea-4f68-8bb6-fbd3b85041e3@windriver.com> X-Last-TLS-Session-Version: TLSv1.3 List-Id: X-Webhook-Received: from 45-33-107-173.ip.linodeusercontent.com [45.33.107.173] by aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org with HTTPS for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2026 16:57:55 -0000 X-Groupsio-URL: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/241099 On Thu Jul 16, 2026 at 12:14 PM CEST, Deepesh Varatharajan wrote: > > On 16-07-2026 12:44, Mathieu Dubois-Briand wrote: >> CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! >> Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender a= nd know the content is safe. >> >> On Wed Jul 15, 2026 at 8:00 AM CEST, Deepesh via lists.openembedded.org = Varatharajan wrote: >>> From: Deepesh Varatharajan >>> >>> This patch series introduces a test framework to run selftests for >>> target builds of Clang, LLVM, and LLD. >>> >> Hi Deepesh, >> >> Thanks for your patch. >> >> It looks like it does introduce reproducibility issues: >> >> AssertionError: The following deb packages are different and not in excl= usion list: >> /srv/pokybuild/yocto-worker/reproducible/build/build-st/reproducibleB-ex= tended/tmp/deploy/deb/./x86-64-v3/rust-dbg_1.97.0-r0_amd64.deb >> /srv/pokybuild/yocto-worker/reproducible/build/build-st/reproducibleB-ex= tended/tmp/deploy/deb/./x86-64-v3/rust_1.97.0-r0_amd64.deb >> The following ipk packages are different and not in exclusion list: >> /srv/pokybuild/yocto-worker/reproducible/build/build-st/reproducibleB-ex= tended/tmp/deploy/ipk/./x86-64-v3/rust-dbg_1.97.0-r0_x86-64-v3.ipk >> /srv/pokybuild/yocto-worker/reproducible/build/build-st/reproducibleB-ex= tended/tmp/deploy/ipk/./x86-64-v3/rust_1.97.0-r0_x86-64-v3.ipk >> >> https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/valkyrie/#/builders/37/builds/4386 >> https://valkyrie.yocto.io/pub/repro-fail/oe-reproducible-20260715-161pbd= ip/packages/diff-html/ >> >> I did not really identified where the difference come from. Can you have >> a look at the issue? >> >> Thanks, >> Mathieu > Hi Mathieu, > > I don't think the reproducibility issue is caused by the clang testsuite= =20 > changes. > Those changes are guarded by the `CLANG_ENABLE_TESTSUITE` variable, so=20 > they should > not affect a normal Rust build. Before sending the patch, I also ran a=20 > couple of > tests, including reproducibility testing, and did not encounter any issue= s. > > I did a bit more digging into the AB builds and found the following: > > https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/valkyrie/#/builders/37/builds/4378 > > It looks like the same Rust reproducibility failure occurred in your test= ing > two days ago, when the clang-testsuite related changes were not yet prese= nt > in your branch. I am not sure what is causing rust repro failures in AB. > > Could you please run the reproducibility test one more time and let me kn= ow > if the failure occurs again? > > If the reproducibility issue doesn't occur again, we should consider fili= ng > a Yocto bug to track these intermittent Rust reproducibility failures. > > Regards, > Deepesh >> >> -- >> Mathieu Dubois-Briand, Bootlin >> Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering >> https://bootlin.com >> After a few more builds, it might be and intermittent failure from another patch. I will add back this series, in a few days; I first want to get more data on the failure. Thanks, Mathieu --=20 Mathieu Dubois-Briand, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com