From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 727C141B355; Thu, 23 Jul 2026 20:33:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784838815; cv=none; b=G0oUKYCsPFuknqLH9DWf1lYUPHLbbhU0BfHXIZvMXh7eH7fECWmuSdKc6CMTvHExS3e4lh5vYa4w+DKHQi2g7dMsmCeRimo1V32XU3vTr+tIR5n/OCf1MmxWqUwGJe3kaFmStLcXA1+qm1XF8Fj6he8fHqF5EaG3AA3hqehlIes= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784838815; c=relaxed/simple; bh=DO/gJqdawW9CmZ4EJe+UiBo1+9edT2zPkjP1BwpP49o=; h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:Message-Id:Subject:Cc:To:From: References:In-Reply-To; b=Bi2nlTGEuVDOOjTKXl1Z/ZASLex342/8knfiOESV3xiKggjVeKvzRb1nE8ajK2BzsEeouOOTJ2qes2uZfyhK3uQmiAOY05mcN/Vh09v4oHsujnpX+YCqz5RdbYaDgIck1kyGY7KXoDtykAjrcbpPB+YouRlwwtzxI5451mc7EPo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=WyQO0eHk; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="WyQO0eHk" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6450D1F000E9; Thu, 23 Jul 2026 20:33:18 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1784838803; bh=qKMBkfA4Fscc9gb2Mwxxm/SG+O1Cf4fPyQiewhN8Y88=; h=Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:References:In-Reply-To; b=WyQO0eHk6YYNhnOQuGfvCK+4OXDBlKSRtLW2n42OKeh+sdzsP4j+ATDn/yv3MXCuc qIbtqjSeZ2bzRTL1G5pBiJsfWbK5TsR1OI8I38sJ08+0OkaU/yv0f7RFokmF4EAr9y 7vkku2frWqcCajVSImHbP0ptjJWOM1pu9W9R/IMe3l++jearHhB72v82hRjCRVs48e mF4N9QL5vHzIRBMktag3UFz1fQGdrRmPzI7k9DbnWEhiDY0uR/vQ+b9Rj/oWngAKb/ zPpYmJNQqM5axXZFgefC3lN2fzg/EuCGmG1mMoDaewVP3BstCva8lQfn29BHlo0i+p bqYwfHljPIJog== Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2026 22:33:16 +0200 Message-Id: Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.18 0000/1624] 6.18.40-rc2 review Cc: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , "Eliot Courtney" , "John Hubbard" , "Alexandre Courbot" , "Alice Ryhl" , To: "Miguel Ojeda" From: "Danilo Krummrich" References: <20260722142910.893804136@linuxfoundation.org> <20260723154303.11008-1-ojeda@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20260723154303.11008-1-ojeda@kernel.org> On Thu Jul 23, 2026 at 5:43 PM CEST, Miguel Ojeda wrote: > I suggest dropping commit > > d8fa174e21c8 ("gpu: nova-core: vbios: read BitToken using FromBytes") > > for now -- it was not marked for stable, and as far as I know, there are > no production users of Nova, especially in stable kernels. Yes, we can just drop the commit. In general, for now we should only backpo= rt nova patches that could get into the way of testing stable releases in one = or the other way. > If we want to fix the bug, then we may want a custom minimal patch. Yeah, I don't think there's much value; in the best case it fixes something= that isn't used in production anyways, and in the worst case it causes noise if = it breaks the build. > I hope that helps! Thanks!