Re: [PATCH bpf-next v1 07/14] bpf, loongarch: Fix stack arguments for indirect trampolines

["Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi" <memxor@gmail.com>]

On Fri Aug 28, 2026 at 10:19 AM CEST, Tiezhu Yang wrote:
> On 2026/8/28 下午12:55, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi wrote:
>> On Fri Aug 28, 2026 at 6:33 AM CEST, Tiezhu Yang wrote:
>
> ...
>
>>> With this patch:
>>>
>>>     $ sudo ./test_progs -t struct_ops_trampoline
>>>     #471     struct_ops_trampoline:OK
>>>     Summary: 1/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
>>>
>>> Tested-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
>>
>> Thanks a lot for the test. Please also take a look at the argument rebase
>> patches once you folks have more cycles. Will definitely need your help and
>> reviews since they are mostly vibe coded.
>
> Hi Kumar,
>
> I have sent a standalone prerequisite fix for the pre-existing
> issue:
>
> LoongArch: BPF: Fix off-by-one error for insn_is_cast_user
> https://lore.kernel.org/loongarch/20260828075100.24776-1-yangtiezhu@loongson.cn/
>
> IMO, when you respin, please rebase your patches 07, 08, and 09
> on top of this fix for your v2 series.
>
> Additionally, please send the v2 as a standalone series to the
> loongarch mailing list loongarch@lists.linux.dev and the reviewer
> Hengqi Chen <hengqi.chen@gmail.com> too, as the LoongArch BPF JIT
> patches are typically routed through the loongarch-next tree.
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/loongarch/CAAhV-H55YcyXRewC+0YzTHXb1jab0GkAV13EF9nFbTx=UkX4ww@mail.gmail.com/
>

Ok, I will send v2 without loongarch changes and then split out and send them
separately later on (or let me know if you'd like to commandeer them, I'm happy
to do it either way).

Thanks