All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jasmeet (Jazz) Bhatia" <jasmeet.bhatia.us@gmail.com>
To: "Ard Biesheuvel" <ardb@kernel.org>,
	"Jasmeet (Jazz) Bhatia" <jasmeet.bhatia.us@gmail.com>
Cc: "Ilias Apalodimas" <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	"Pavel Machek" <pavel@ucw.cz>, <linux-efi@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>, <x86@kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] efi/tpm: Preserve event log without changing x86 E820
Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2026 08:45:30 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <DL6NCV1KQ9F9.6K6XZQCS4AF3@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a9e23066-aa75-44be-ac3b-9a15f4cf6047@app.fastmail.com>

On Thu Sep 3, 2026 at 7:18 AM PDT, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> Hi Jazz,
>
> On Tue, 1 Sep 2026, at 13:34, Jasmeet (Jazz) Bhatia wrote:
>> The EFI stub currently allocates the TPM event log as
>> EFI_ACPI_RECLAIM_MEMORY. On x86, this becomes an ACPI data entry
>> in the E820 map.
>>
>> On a Framework Laptop 16 (AMD Ryzen AI 300 Series), the EFI allocator
>> can place this allocation at different physical addresses across boots.
>> Since x86 hibernation validates architecture-specific data from
>> the firmware E820 map, this causes an otherwise valid hibernation image
>> to be rejected on resume with the following error:
>>
>>   Hibernate inconsistent memory map detected!
>>   PM: hibernation: Image mismatch: architecture specific data
>>
>> Allocating the event log as EFI_LOADER_DATA avoids changing the E820
>> map, but doing that alone would regress the kexec corruption issue fixed
>> by commit 77d48d39e991 ("efistub/tpm: Use ACPI reclaim memory for event
>> log to avoid corruption").
>>
>
> As I replied in the other thread, I am not convinced preserving the TPM
> event log across a kexec makes sense to begin with. This is the firmware's
> view of the state of the TPM PCRs when it handed over the system to the
> first OS.
>
> If the first OS boots, loads a kexec kernel and then boots it without
> measuring any of that into the TPM, the TPM event log will match the
> TPM state, but this is meaningless because of the missing measurements,
> and the attestation chain is broken.
>
> If the first OS does perform TPM measurements, it would need to record
> them into a log and pass that on to the kexec'ed in some implementation
> specific way - it cannot use the existing TPM event log for that.
>
> TL;DR perhaps we should just discard the TPM event log reference from
> the EFI config tables after consuming it. Or add a special case to the
> kexec code to disregard it.
Ok, honestly that makes a lot of sense I see what you are saying and I
tend to agree. I'm treating the copied event log at something that
survives kexec in this patch because of the corruption fix so I'll look
at dropping that LINUX_EFI_TPM_EVENT_LOG_GUID reference and rewrite this
patch. Hopefully, that will avoid that x86 E820 instability as well.

Appreciate the guidance!

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-04 15:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-01 11:34 [PATCH v1 0/2] efi/tpm: Preserve event log without changing x86 E820 Jasmeet (Jazz) Bhatia
2026-09-01 11:34 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] efi/libstub: Install memreserve table on x86 Jasmeet (Jazz) Bhatia
2026-09-01 11:34 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] efi/tpm: Persistently reserve the TPM event log Jasmeet (Jazz) Bhatia
2026-09-03 14:18 ` [PATCH v1 0/2] efi/tpm: Preserve event log without changing x86 E820 Ard Biesheuvel
2026-09-04 15:45   ` Jasmeet (Jazz) Bhatia [this message]
2026-09-04 16:38     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2026-09-07 15:57       ` Ilias Apalodimas
2026-09-11  3:03         ` Jasmeet (Jazz) Bhatia

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=DL6NCV1KQ9F9.6K6XZQCS4AF3@gmail.com \
    --to=jasmeet.bhatia.us@gmail.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.