From: "Théo Lebrun" <theo.lebrun@bootlin.com>
To: "James Clark" <jjc@jclark.com>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "Richard Cochran" <richardcochran@gmail.com>,
"Conor Dooley" <conor.dooley@microchip.com>,
"Andrew Lunn" <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Nicolai Buchwitz" <nb@tipi-net.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] net: macb: fix ordering around PTP timestamp read
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2026 09:13:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DLBG7UPDG84Y.18RL7VOGSDMQY@bootlin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260910040658.18359-1-jjc@jclark.com>
Hello James,
On Thu Sep 10, 2026 at 6:06 AM CEST, James Clark wrote:
> PTP_SYS_OFFSET_EXTENDED returns system timestamps that do not correctly
> bracket the PHC register read on MACB/GEM. On a Raspberry Pi 5, the
> returned interval can be as short as 37 ns, while an ordered register
> read takes approximately 1 us. This biases the midpoint used by phc2sys,
> causing CLOCK_REALTIME to run approximately 0.5 us ahead when synchronized
> to the PHC.
>
> gem_tsu_get_time() reads the nanoseconds register using the driver's
> relaxed MMIO accessor. On weakly ordered systems, the subsequent system
> timestamp can be taken before the register read completes. The internal
> smp_rmb() in the pre-timestamp path also does not guarantee ordering
> against the subsequent MMIO read.
>
> Add rmb() before and after the bracketed nanoseconds read in both the
> normal and seconds rollover paths so the system timestamps bracket the
> PHC read. Adding the post-read barrier increases the minimum interval on
> the same Raspberry Pi 5 to approximately 1 us.
>
> Fixes: e51bb5c2784c ("net: macb: ptp: Switch to gettimex64() interface")
> Tested-by: Nicolai Buchwitz <nb@tipi-net.de> # Raspberry Pi CM5, min bracket 37 ns -> 981 ns
> Reviewed-by: Nicolai Buchwitz <nb@tipi-net.de>
> Signed-off-by: James Clark <jjc@jclark.com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Add rmb() before the PHC read in both paths, following Théo Lebrun's
> feedback. Explain why the pre-timestamp path's smp_rmb() is insufficient
> for MMIO ordering.
> - Wrap the post-read barrier comments.
> - Add Nicolai Buchwitz's Tested-by and Reviewed-by tags.
> - Drop RFC.
>
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20260908053150.28694-1-jjc@jclark.com/
>
> Nicolai's review and testing were on v1. The additional pre-read barriers
> in v2 address Théo's feedback.
[...]
> drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb_ptp.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb_ptp.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb_ptp.c
> index e5195d7da..4fb287608 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb_ptp.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb_ptp.c
> @@ -50,7 +50,15 @@ static int gem_tsu_get_time(struct ptp_clock_info *ptp, struct timespec64 *ts,
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(&bp->tsu_clk_lock, flags);
> ptp_read_system_prets(sts);
> + /* ptp_read_system_prets() uses smp_rmb() internally,
> + * which does not guarantee ordering against MMIO reads.
> + */
> + rmb();
> first = gem_readl(bp, TN);
> + /* Ensure the PHC read completes before taking
> + * the post timestamp.
> + */
> + rmb();
> ptp_read_system_postts(sts);
> secl = gem_readl(bp, TSL);
> sech = gem_readl(bp, TSH);
> @@ -62,7 +70,15 @@ static int gem_tsu_get_time(struct ptp_clock_info *ptp, struct timespec64 *ts,
> * (assume all done within 1s)
> */
> ptp_read_system_prets(sts);
> + /* ptp_read_system_prets() uses smp_rmb() internally,
> + * which does not guarantee ordering against MMIO reads.
> + */
> + rmb();
> ts->tv_nsec = gem_readl(bp, TN);
> + /* Ensure the PHC read completes before taking
> + * the post timestamp.
> + */
> + rmb();
> ptp_read_system_postts(sts);
> secl = gem_readl(bp, TSL);
> sech = gem_readl(bp, TSH);
Honestly I wouldn't be surprised to see this code without comments.
Especially as the rmb() were added in a separate commit so git
blame/log will point to your commit message which is plentiful. It
would have been different if the rmb were part of the commit
introducing gettimex64 support, with a commit message which would
probably not talk about why rmb are required.
Don't bother sending a new revision just for that though!
With or without the code comments:
Reviewed-by: Théo Lebrun <theo.lebrun@bootlin.com>
Thanks James,
--
Théo Lebrun, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-10 7:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-10 4:06 [PATCH net v2] net: macb: fix ordering around PTP timestamp read James Clark
2026-09-10 7:13 ` Théo Lebrun [this message]
2026-09-15 0:39 ` Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DLBG7UPDG84Y.18RL7VOGSDMQY@bootlin.com \
--to=theo.lebrun@bootlin.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=conor.dooley@microchip.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=jjc@jclark.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nb@tipi-net.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.