From: "Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi" <memxor@gmail.com>
To: "Mykola Lysenko" <nickolay.lysenko@gmail.com>, <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <ast@kernel.org>, <daniel@iogearbox.net>, <andrii@kernel.org>,
<eddyz87@gmail.com>, <martin.lau@linux.dev>, <song@kernel.org>,
<yonghong.song@linux.dev>, <jolsa@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v8 0/9] selftests/bpf: restructure the Makefile as a layered build
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2026 11:28:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DLKVZP748QOP.1VIVZ564W1X4G@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260921075855.2065871-1-nickolay.lysenko@gmail.com>
On Mon Sep 21, 2026 at 9:58 AM CEST, Mykola Lysenko wrote:
> The BPF selftests Makefile has grown to ~1,100 lines, with much of the
> complexity concentrated in the DEFINE_TEST_RUNNER double-expansion
> machinery: the per-runner rules are written in $$-escaped make and
> eval'd once per flavor, so the rules that actually run never appear in
> the source and are easy to break for one flavor while testing another.
>
Applied, for any other comments let us do it as follow ups, if necessary.
> [...]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-21 9:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-21 7:58 [PATCH bpf-next v8 0/9] selftests/bpf: restructure the Makefile as a layered build Mykola Lysenko
2026-09-21 7:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 1/9] selftests/bpf: keep headers off the generic link command line Mykola Lysenko
2026-09-21 7:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 2/9] selftests/bpf: drop stale lines, restore two header dependencies Mykola Lysenko
2026-09-21 9:06 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-21 9:21 ` Mykola Lysenko
2026-09-21 7:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 3/9] selftests/bpf: factor the permissive-mode skip suffix into a helper Mykola Lysenko
2026-09-21 8:09 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-21 7:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 4/9] selftests/bpf: generate the signing key and certificate once Mykola Lysenko
2026-09-21 7:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 5/9] selftests/bpf: generate verifier/tests.h in a regular recipe Mykola Lysenko
2026-09-21 9:06 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-21 12:36 ` Mykola Lysenko
2026-09-21 7:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 6/9] selftests/bpf: derive the bench object list from the sources Mykola Lysenko
2026-09-21 7:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 7/9] selftests/bpf: extract BPF skeleton generation into a helper script Mykola Lysenko
2026-09-21 7:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 8/9] selftests/bpf: move shared build definitions into Makefile.buildvars Mykola Lysenko
2026-09-21 7:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 9/9] selftests/bpf: build each test runner instance in its own sub-make Mykola Lysenko
2026-09-21 9:22 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-21 12:08 ` Mykola Lysenko
2026-09-21 9:28 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi [this message]
2026-09-21 9:30 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 0/9] selftests/bpf: restructure the Makefile as a layered build patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DLKVZP748QOP.1VIVZ564W1X4G@gmail.com \
--to=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=nickolay.lysenko@gmail.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.