From: "Alexei Starovoitov" <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
To: "Andrey Grodzovsky" <andrey.grodzovsky@crowdstrike.com>,
<bpf@vger.kernel.org>, <andrii@kernel.org>
Cc: <martin.kelly@crowdstrike.com>, <slava.imameev@crowdstrike.com>,
<linux-open-source@crowdstrike.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 0/7] libbpf: BPF program manual loading
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2026 01:37:01 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DLLGL0Q2REDU.3CMU5XBIMBWGC@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260921223937.3203093-1-andrey.grodzovsky@crowdstrike.com>
On Mon, Sep 21, 2026 at 06:39 PM Andrey Grodzovsky <andrey.grodzovsky@crowdstrike.com> wrote:
> after the initial bpf_object load. This v4 addresses all outstanding review
> feedback from v3's two CI bots, folds bpf_program__load_manually()/
> unload_manually() into a single load()/unload() naming pair, and adds
> a new patch that properly versions bpf_program__set_autoattach()'s
> ABI change instead of leaving it as a silent break for out-of-tree
> consumers (see changelog below).
What happened to the veristat conversion?
In v2 Andrii asked to try this in veristat to see whether it can replace
bpf_program__clone():
https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAEf4Bzaf9AMBUWQeUj1Uor8F7A-tOPpVMa-CjRB0MNH4zRHEeQ@mail.gmail.com/
and you replied that it builds and passes test_progs -t veristat.
Pls include that patch in the respin.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-22 1:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-21 22:39 [PATCH bpf-next v4 0/7] libbpf: BPF program manual loading Andrey Grodzovsky
2026-09-21 22:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 1/7] libbpf: BPF program load strategy enum Andrey Grodzovsky
2026-09-21 23:21 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-21 22:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 2/7] libbpf: BPF programs manual loading and attaching Andrey Grodzovsky
2026-09-21 23:03 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-22 23:51 ` Andrey Grodzovsky
2026-09-21 22:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 3/7] libbpf: Support declarative manual load via SEC("!...") prefix Andrey Grodzovsky
2026-09-21 23:12 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-21 23:21 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-21 22:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 4/7] libbpf: Reject gen_loader for objects with already-manual programs Andrey Grodzovsky
2026-09-21 22:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 5/7] libbpf: Version bpf_program__set_autoattach() ABI change Andrey Grodzovsky
2026-09-21 23:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-21 22:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 6/7] selftests/bpf: Cover BPF program load strategy transitions Andrey Grodzovsky
2026-09-21 23:37 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-21 22:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 7/7] selftests/bpf: Cover BPF program manual loading Andrey Grodzovsky
2026-09-22 1:37 ` Alexei Starovoitov [this message]
2026-09-22 14:34 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 0/7] libbpf: " Andrey Grodzovsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DLLGL0Q2REDU.3CMU5XBIMBWGC@gmail.com \
--to=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=andrey.grodzovsky@crowdstrike.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-open-source@crowdstrike.com \
--cc=martin.kelly@crowdstrike.com \
--cc=slava.imameev@crowdstrike.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.