From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3597CC982FA for ; Tue, 22 Sep 2026 12:20:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtpout-03.galae.net (smtpout-03.galae.net [185.246.85.4]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.msgproc02-g2.8776.1790079602951634031 for ; Tue, 22 Sep 2026 05:20:03 -0700 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=pass header.i=@bootlin.com header.s=dkim header.b=FJkqY98D; spf=pass (domain: bootlin.com, ip: 185.246.85.4, mailfrom: antonin.godard@bootlin.com) Received: from smtpout-01.galae.net (smtpout-01.galae.net [212.83.139.233]) by smtpout-03.galae.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 121014E41029; Tue, 22 Sep 2026 12:20:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.galae.net (mail.galae.net [212.83.136.155]) by smtpout-01.galae.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC05760580; Tue, 22 Sep 2026 12:20:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Mailerdaemon) with ESMTPSA id BC68C10329114; Tue, 22 Sep 2026 14:19:55 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=dkim; t=1790079596; h=from:subject:date:message-id:to:mime-version:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:references; bh=CyB13yWYdxpIFDGHSM/31/Jxe0ISUO2nh0SizBmMcbY=; b=FJkqY98D+jr5c8WdFuFA4qR5pRkXBqHmcUEvNbUAQPRcmSe+aSXz10c+BjiAe+UlVVxnlz QsU2t9zeshTRf+iicE7cuVZ8bTkEHFN+eQcKA1YaoXkUDSftKwc4Ow49Dta7mQWDBdmZsM UoexYCeu7WOaxU/JsAc65qC8fnB36vBizGNIVB1TlgBuK6B2sXXcNEclCIsgoFXvoLFF+O 8Tyao9ozXgYWrm1s4/w4YGJyghgXdDw++7u9dOZZOhb4hey6druF74EBjd/v1K9imIFrHd uyLhUMdHtseCEDgIyzqeU/0ITTDP/wwb2lv9pv5v+G5zmX4vmfq3j4dJ3IBDaA== Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2026 14:19:55 +0200 Message-Id: From: "Antonin Godard" To: , Subject: Re: [docs] [PATCH 07/10] kernel-dev: give each example block one thing to hold References: <20260922020339.481929-1-twoerner@gmail.com> <20260922020339.481929-8-twoerner@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20260922020339.481929-8-twoerner@gmail.com> X-Last-TLS-Session-Version: TLSv1.3 List-Id: X-Webhook-Received: from 45-33-107-173.ip.linodeusercontent.com [45.33.107.173] by aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org with HTTPS for ; Tue, 22 Sep 2026 12:20:06 -0000 X-Groupsio-URL: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/docs/message/10582 Hi, On Tue Sep 22, 2026 at 4:03 AM CEST, Trevor Woerner via lists.yoctoproject.= org wrote: [...] > diff --git a/documentation/sphinx-static/theme_overrides.css b/documentat= ion/sphinx-static/theme_overrides.css > index 1a439e9faf69..d7d1c6da79b5 100644 > --- a/documentation/sphinx-static/theme_overrides.css > +++ b/documentation/sphinx-static/theme_overrides.css > @@ -116,6 +116,33 @@ section#welcome-to-the-yocto-project-documentation p= .caption { > -ms-user-select: none; > } > =20 > +/* A code-block caption names the file the block came from, so it > + should read as a filename rather than as prose, and sit on the block > + it titles rather than floating above it. */ > +.rst-content .literal-block-wrapper .code-block-caption { > + font-style: normal; > + font-family: SFMono-Regular, Menlo, Monaco, Consolas, monospace; I think this shows with a different font compared to the code-block, on my build. On my system the font-family definition for code-blocks is "SFMono-Regular, Menlo, Monaco, Consolas, Liberation Mono, Courier New, Cou= rier, monospace;". Could we inherit from that, or at least have the same definiti= on for both? Antonin