From: "Alexei Starovoitov" <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
To: "Christian Brauner" <brauner@kernel.org>,
<linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>, <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
"Paul Moore" <paul@paul-moore.com>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
<stable@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] ns: fixes for the namespace LSM hooks
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2026 23:31:32 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DMF5U0PAK4HE.2QQ66SZMEMQLA@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261026-work-security-namespace_free-v1-0-ffa3ebbf71bd@kernel.org>
On Mon, Oct 26, 2026 at 02:57 AM Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> wrote:
> I'd want to get the first three patches into v7.4 since the hooks are
> new this cycle. The systemd change I have for this uses the
> namespace_free hook whenever the kernel has it. On a kernel with the
> hook but without the first fix it would never learn about dead user
> namespaces.
Why not the whole series?
Otherwise 7.4 will be the only release where namespace_init sees
ns_id == 0 and bpf progs that key by it will have to deal with that.
Also the test for patch 1 is in patch 8 and it needs patch 5.
For bpf bits:
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-26 23:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-26 9:57 [PATCH 0/8] ns: fixes for the namespace LSM hooks Christian Brauner
2026-10-26 9:57 ` [PATCH 1/8] lsm: always call the namespace_free hook Christian Brauner
2026-10-26 10:37 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-26 9:57 ` [PATCH 2/8] bpf: don't mark namespace_init and namespace_free arguments as trusted Christian Brauner
2026-10-26 10:41 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-26 9:57 ` [PATCH 3/8] selftests/bpf: add verifier tests for the namespace LSM hooks Christian Brauner
2026-10-26 10:44 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-26 9:57 ` [PATCH 4/8] landlock: pass the namespace id to log to check_ns_type() Christian Brauner
2026-10-26 10:45 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-29 11:27 ` Mickaël Salaün
2026-10-26 9:57 ` [PATCH 5/8] ns: allocate the namespace id before the namespace_init hook Christian Brauner
2026-10-26 10:51 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-26 9:57 ` [PATCH 6/8] nstree: drop ns_tree_add_raw() Christian Brauner
2026-10-26 10:55 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-26 9:57 ` [PATCH 7/8] lsm: fix the security_namespace_init() kernel-doc Christian Brauner
2026-10-26 10:57 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-26 9:57 ` [PATCH 8/8] selftests/bpf: add a lifecycle test for the namespace LSM hooks Christian Brauner
2026-10-26 11:03 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-26 20:31 ` [PATCH 0/8] ns: fixes " Paul Moore
2026-10-27 9:24 ` Christian Brauner
2026-10-27 14:36 ` Daniel Borkmann
2026-10-27 22:37 ` Paul Moore
2026-10-28 10:42 ` Christian Brauner
2026-10-28 15:59 ` Paul Moore
2026-10-26 23:31 ` Alexei Starovoitov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DMF5U0PAK4HE.2QQ66SZMEMQLA@gmail.com \
--to=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.