All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Farid Zakaria" <farid.m.zakaria@gmail.com>
To: "Junio C Hamano" <gitster@pobox.com>,
	"Farid Zakaria" <farid.m.zakaria@gmail.com>
Cc: "Kristoffer Haugsbakk" <kristofferhaugsbakk@fastmail.com>,
	<git@vger.kernel.org>, "Patrick Steinhardt" <ps@pks.im>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] notes: do not drop notes written by a concurrent process
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2026 15:16:01 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <DMHO3TPL4QDJ.2G50G0W2R3ZGB@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqzevwyyi1.fsf@gitster.g>

On Thu Oct 29, 2026 at 2:42 PM PDT, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> "Farid Zakaria" <farid.m.zakaria@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> I felt confident reviewing the current patch at it's current state
>> (AI-assisted) and I do concur that it's a net-positive change in the
>> interim.
>
> Sorry, but I find the above very confusing, and I cannot figure out
> who is reviewing whose patch, and who is concuring whose statement
> that said what.

It's because I bottom-posted; I thought it might be easier to read that
way -- I guess not.

I was just trying to say that I felt confident in my comprehension of
this current patch, and agreed with Kristoffer that it's a positive
change as it stands, although the algorithm could be improved to handle
cases with different branches as mentioned.

(hopefully that's a little more concise and clear)

      reply	other threads:[~2026-10-29 22:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-29  3:55 [PATCH] notes: do not drop notes written by a concurrent process Farid Zakaria
2026-10-29 11:05 ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2026-10-29 18:25   ` Junio C Hamano
2026-10-29 20:56     ` Farid Zakaria
2026-10-29 21:42       ` Junio C Hamano
2026-10-29 22:16         ` Farid Zakaria [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=DMHO3TPL4QDJ.2G50G0W2R3ZGB@gmail.com \
    --to=farid.m.zakaria@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=kristofferhaugsbakk@fastmail.com \
    --cc=ps@pks.im \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.